Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31788490›Full record

ArticleMedical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal2019

Multimodal Imaging of Acute Central Retinal Artery Occlusion.

Marwa Mahmoud Abdellah

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Optical coherence tomography in the emergency department setting: a case series.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Progress in central retinal artery occlusion: a narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marwa Mahmoud AbdellahDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
Sohag University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe fluorescein angiography (FA), ocular coherence tomography (OCT) and ocular coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in the diagnosis of acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). This is an observational case series study performed at Sohag Ophthalmic Investigation Center. Fifteen patients presented by a sudden marked unilateral diminution of vision were included. Corrected Distance Visual acuity (CDVA), color fundus photos, FA, OCT and OCTA, imaging obtained in the first week of presentation and imaging of the other normal eye as a control were assessed. Central macular thickness (CMT), parafoveal inner retinal layers thickness and parafoveal outer retinal thickness in diseased and contralateral normal eyes were compared. Fifteen patients (mean age 52.67 years, 11-74 years old) including 66.7% male entered the study. CDVA ranged from no perception of light to 0.05 (20/400). Fundus examination showed a cherry red spot in 10 cases (66.7 %) and retinal whitening in 9 cases (60%), arteriolar narrowing in 7 (46.67%), optic disc edema in 4 (26.67%), optic disc pallor in 5 (33.3%) and cattle trucking in 5 (33.3%). Fluorescein angiography showed delayed arteriovenous transit time > 23 seconds in 8 cases (53.33 %) and normal FA in 4 cases (26.67 %). OCT revealed increased hyperreflective of the inner retinal layers in comparison to hyporeflective inner retinal layers in all cases (100%) and significant increase in CMT in 10 cases (66.67%). The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of CMT (CRAO) was 306.5 ± 27.9 (P < 0.001), the parafoveal inner retinal thickness (CRAO) 345 ± 51.8 µm (P < 0.001) and the parafoveal outer retinal thickness (CRAO) 120.9 ± 13.6 µm (P < 0.001). OCTA was performed and clear images obtained in 11 cases (73.33%). Disruption of superficial and deep capillary plexus was found in all cases. We concluded that the OCT is the most confirmative imaging method in the diagnosis of acute CRAO even in the absence of fundus signs. OCTA confirms the diagnosis, but it cannot be performed in some cases.

Indexed as

Central Retinal Artery OcclusionOCTOptical Coherence TomographyRetinal InfarctionRetinal Ischemia

Identifiers

PMID31788490
PMCPMC6778676
OpenAlexW3003703138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.