Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31788396›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2019

Soft Set Theory for Decision Making in Computational Biology under Incomplete Information.

Beatriz Santos-Buitrago, Adrián Riesco, Merrill Knapp, José Carlos R Alcantud, Gustavo Santos-GARCíA, Carolyn Talcott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Beatriz Santos-BuitragoBio and Health Informatics Laboratory, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
Adrián RiescoUniversidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Merrill KnappBiosciences Division, Stanford Research Institute International, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
José Carlos R AlcantudIME, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Gustavo Santos-GARCíABORDA Research Unit, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Carolyn TalcottComputer Science Laboratory, Stanford Research Institute International, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.

Funding

FORMAL METHODS APPLIED TO BIOLOGICAL SIGNALING NETWORKSR33GM068146 · NIGMS · SRI INTERNATIONAL · PI LADEROUTE, KEITH R. · 2005 to 2006
$777k
NIGMS NIH HHS R33 GM068146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of biological systems is complex and of great importance. There exist numerous approaches to signal transduction processes, including symbolic modeling of cellular adaptation. The use of formal methods for computational systems biology eases the analysis of cellular models and the establishment of the causes and consequences of certain cellular situations associated to diseases. In this paper, we define an application of logic modeling with rewriting logic and soft set theory. Our approach to decision making with soft sets offers a novel strategy that complements standard strategies. We implement a metalevel strategy to control and guide the rewriting process of the Maude rewriting engine. In particular, we adapt mathematical methods to capture imprecision, vagueness, and uncertainty in the available data. Using this new strategy, we propose an extension in the biological symbolic models of Pathway Logic. Our ultimate aim is to automatically determine the rules that are most appropriate and adjusted to reality in dynamic systems using decision making with incomplete soft sets.

Indexed as

Biological system modelingDecision makingRewriting logicRewriting strategiesSoft setSymbolic systems biology

Identifiers

PMID31788396
PMCPMC6884365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.