ArticleCureus2019
A Cross-sectional Study of the Myths Regarding Room Ventilation in Puerperium Among Saudi Women.
Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Despite the advances in medical health care services, people still believe and follow their traditions. Some of the traditional postpartum practices are harmful to women's health contrary to the common belief. The objective of this study is to investigate the prevalence of myths regarding room ventilation (MRV) among Saudi women. Methods We conducted an observational cross-sectional study on 355 women in the postpartum period from the outpatient clinic of Mother and Child Hospital (MCH), Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia. The investigators interviewed all the study participants to fill the proformas and collect all the study data. We analyzed the study data to estimate the prevalence of MRV in our sample as well as the factors associated with MRV. Results Most of our study participants were above 30 years (45%), multigravida (85%), and went through a cesarean section (78%). There was a significant association between MRV and education (P<0.001), occupation (P<0.001), and parity (P<0.001) but not with age (P=0.136). The prevalence of MRV dropped from 80% in women who had primary education only to 13% in women who had high school and college education. Also, it differed according to the participant's occupational status. MRV was prevalent in 56% of housewives vs. only 17% of the employed women. Moreover, it showed a substantial change with parity status. MRV increased from 23% in primiparous to 53% in multigravida. Conclusion Our results showed that the MRV is highly prevalent in the Saudi Arabia community and higher levels of education were negatively associated with the beliefs in the MRV. These findings highlight the importance of proper health education of pregnant women as well as the need for a prompt response from the Ministry of Health towards the MRV to eliminate it and spread the proper postpartum health care practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.