Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31788325›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2019

Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of Changing Health for the management of prediabetes: protocol for a pilot study of a digital behavioural intervention.

Sophie Cassidy, Nduka Okwose, Jadine Scragg, David Houghton, Kirsten Ashley, Michael I Trenell, Djordje G Jakovljevic, Kate Hallsworth, Leah Avery

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie Cassidy1Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0228-7274
Nduka Okwose1Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Jadine Scragg1Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
David Houghton1Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Kirsten Ashley1Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Michael I Trenell2NIHR Innovation Observatory, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Djordje G Jakovljevic1Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Kate Hallsworth *1Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Leah Avery *4Centre for Rehabilitation, Exercise and Sports Sciences, School of Health & Social Care, Teesside University, Tees Valley, UK.
Newcastle University · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre · GBTeesside University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of prediabetes is rapidly rising in the UK, largely associated with an increase in obesity. Lifestyle programmes that provide support to make and sustain dietary and physical activity behavioural changes are necessary to initiate and maintain weight loss. However, these programmes are often intensive and time consuming. Given the magnitude of the problem, there is a need for behavioural interventions that can be delivered at scale. Digital interventions can address some of the aforementioned issues. The primary aim of the present study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a digital intervention called Changing Health that provides structured education and lifestyle behaviour change support to adults with prediabetes.

methodsA single-group pilot study will be undertaken. We aim to recruit 40 participants with prediabetes defined by HbA1c or fasting plasma glucose (FPG), aged between 18 and 75 years with a BMI ≥ 25. Participants will receive the digital intervention (a mobile phone app incorporating structured education and behavioural tools to support lifestyle behaviour change) with the aim of losing and maintaining 5-6% of their baseline body weight. Each participant will receive 100 min of lifestyle coaching over the 9-month intervention period and will have continued access to the digital intervention. Clinical outcome measures will be collected during four visits to our clinical research facility: two visits at baseline, one visit at month 3, and one visit at month 9. These secondary outcome measures will include diet, physical activity, sleep, metabolic control, body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness, and cardiovascular function. To measure primary outcomes, an embedded qualitative study will be conducted to obtain data on feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. DISCUSSION: This pilot study will establish whether Changing Health is feasible and acceptable to adults with prediabetes. Clinical outcome measures will provide estimates of variability to inform sample size calculations, and qualitative data generated will inform any necessary refinements to the intervention. This will provide a platform for a larger evaluation to assess the effectiveness of Changing Health for changing diet and physical activity to initiate and maintain weight loss in adults with prediabetes.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN69270299.

Indexed as

DietDigital interventionLifestyle behaviour changePhysical activityPrediabetesWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID31788325
PMCPMC6878649
OpenAlexW2980330272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.