ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2019
Development of a reference data set for assigning
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Species Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Bacterial metataxonomic analysis of the Algerian traditional dried-salted meat 'El Kaddid' and characterization of its lactic acid bacteria.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
- The role of lactate metabolism in shaping intestinal microbiota and health.AIMS microbiology · 2026Review
- Allelopathic compound 2-methoxy-1,4-naphthoquinone is broadly effective against pathogenicAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Epidemiological exploration of fleas and molecular identification of flea-borne viruses in Egyptian small ruminants.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparison of the performance of MiSeq and NovaSeq in oral microbiome study.Journal of oral microbiology · 2024Article
- Black shank-mediated alteration of the community assembly of rhizosphere soil bacteria in tobacco.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Analysis of the gut microbiome in dogs and cats.Veterinary clinical pathology · 2022Review
- Biochemical and molecular identification of Gram-positive isolates with β-hemolysis activity isolated from the nasal swab of pigs during the human meningitis outbreak in Badung Regency, Bali-Indonesia.Veterinary world · 2022Article
- Identification of Clinically RelevantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) as a significant etiological factor of laryngological infections: a review.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many members of Methods: Thirty two strains recovered from clinical samples and 19 reference strains representing 42 streptococcal species and nine enterococcal species were subjected to bacterial identification by four Sanger-based sequencing methods targeting the genes encoding (i) 16S rRNA, (ii) Results: This study allowed obtainment and deposition of reference sequences of the 16S-23S rRNA region for 15 streptococcal and 3 enterococcal species followed by enrichment for 27 and 6 species, respectively, for which reference sequences were available in the databases. For Conclusions: Based on the developed reference dataset, clinically relevant streptococcal and enterococcal species can now be reliably identified by 16S-23S rRNA sequences in samples. This study will be useful for introduction of a novel diagnostic tool, NGS of the 16S-23S rRNA region, which undoubtedly is an improvement for reliable culture-independent species identification directly from polymicrobially constituted clinical samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.