Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31788106›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2019

Novel serum markers HSP60, CHI3L1, and IGFBP-2 in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Michal Vocka, Daniel Langer, Vladimir Fryba, Jaromir Petrtyl, Tomas Hanus, Marta Kalousova, Tomas Zima, Lubos Petruzelka

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Prognostic circulating proteomic biomarkers in colorectal liver metastases.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRJournal of hematology & oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michal VockaDepartment of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Daniel LangerSurgery Department, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, and Military University Hospital in Prague, 169 02 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Vladimir FrybaFirst Department of Surgery, Department of Abdominal, Thoracic Surgery and Traumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Jaromir PetrtylFourth Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Tomas HanusDepartment of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Marta KalousovaInstitute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Tomas ZimaInstitute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Lubos PetruzelkaDepartment of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
General University Hospital in Prague · CZCharles University · CZMilitary University Hospital Prague · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading tumor diagnosis in women and men in the Czech Republic. Patient outcome depends on tumor stage at the time of diagnosis and, in metastatic disease, on the localization and extent of distant metastases. The early detection of metastatic liver disease is an important indication for liver surgery. Therefore, novel biomarkers are urgently required. Serum samples were collected from 97 patients with histologically confirmed metastatic CRC at the time of diagnosis or at the time of progression during palliative treatment, and 79 samples from healthy controls. All patients exhibited adequate liver and renal function and signed informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the current study. The serum levels of Heat shock protein 60 (HSP60), Chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1) and Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP-2) were measured using immunochemistry. The serum levels of HSP60, CHI3L1 and IGFBP-2 were significantly higher in patients with CRC compared with healthy controls. When compared with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), HSP60 exhibited the same sensitivity and specificity, while CHI3L1 and IGFBP-2 exhibited decreased sensitivity. Additionally, the serum levels of HSP60 and IGFBP-2 were indicated to be correlated with the presence of liver metastases, which is in contrast to CEA and Cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). Patients with higher HSP60 and IGFBP-2 levels exhibited a significantly worse survival (P<0.001 and 0.007, respectively). The results of the current study indicate HSP60 to be an effective biomarker in patients with metastatic CRC, with it exhibiting an equal sensitivity to CEA. Additionally, HSP60 and IGFBP-2 levels also strongly correlated with extension of liver metastases and exhibited a prognostic value that contrasted that of CEA.

Indexed as

chitinase-3-like protein 1colorectal cancerheat shock protein 60insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2serum biomarkersurvival

Identifiers

PMID31788106
PMCPMC6864964
OpenAlexW2977122965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.