Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31787844›Full record

ReviewThe obstetrician & gynaecologist : the journal for continuing professional development from the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists2019

Fetal surgery for open spina bifida.

Adalina Sacco, Fred Ushakov, Dominic Thompson, Donald Peebles, Pranav Pandya, Paolo De Coppi, Ruwan Wimalasundera, George Attilakos, Anna Louise David, Jan Deprest

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The obstetrician & gynaecologist : the journal for continuing professional development from the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. The Intrauterine Treatment of Open Spinal Dysraphism.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reflections upon the intrauterine repair of myelomeningocele.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Myelomeningocele: Long-Term Neurosurgical Management.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  16. Assessment of longitudinal brain development using super-resolution magnetic resonance imaging following fetal surgery for open spina bifida.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adalina SaccoClinical Research Fellow, Fetal Medicine Unit Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 235 Euston Road London NW1 2BU UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9182-9628
Fred UshakovSpecialist in Fetal Medicine, Fetal Medicine Unit Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 235 Euston Road London NW1 2BU UK.
Dominic ThompsonConsultant in Paediatric Neurosurgery Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust Great Ormond Street London WC1N 3JH UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1114-9869
Donald PeeblesProfessor of Fetal Medicine, Fetal Medicine Unit Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 235 Euston Road London NW1 2BU UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8562-1970
Pranav PandyaConsultant in Fetal Medicine, Fetal Medicine Unit Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 235 Euston Road London NW1 2BU UK.
Paolo De CoppiProfessor of Paediatric Surgery Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust Great Ormond Street London WC1N 3JH UK.
Ruwan WimalasunderaConsultant in Fetal Medicine, Fetal Medicine Unit Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 235 Euston Road London NW1 2BU UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8995-9346
George AttilakosConsultant in Fetal Medicine, Fetal Medicine Unit Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 235 Euston Road London NW1 2BU UK.
Anna Louise DavidProfessor of Fetal Medicine, Fetal Medicine Unit Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 235 Euston Road London NW1 2BU UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0199-6140
Jan DeprestProfessor of Fetal Medicine, Fetal Medicine Unit Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 235 Euston Road London NW1 2BU UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4920-945X
Royal London Hospital · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key contentSpina bifida is a congenital neurological condition with lifelong physical and mental effects.Open fetal repair of the spinal lesion has been shown to improve hindbrain herniation, ventriculoperitoneal shunting, independent mobility and bladder outcomes for the child and, despite an increased risk of prematurity, does not seem to increase the risk of neurodevelopmental impairment.Open fetal surgery is associated with maternal morbidity.Surgery at our institution is offered and performed according to internationally agreed criteria and protocols.Further evidence regarding long-term outcomes, fetoscopic repair and alternative techniques is awaited. LEARNING

objectivesTo understand the clinical effects, potential prevention and prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida.To understand the rationale and evidence supporting the benefits and risks of fetal repair of open spina bifida.To understand the criteria defining those who are likely to benefit from fetal surgery. ETHICAL ISSUES: The concept of the fetus as a patient, and issues surrounding fetal death or the need for resuscitation during fetal surgery.The associated maternal morbidity in a procedure performed solely for the benefit of the fetus/child.The financial implications of new surgical treatments.

Indexed as

fetal surgeryfetoscopymyelomeningoceleprenatalspina bifida

Identifiers

PMID31787844
PMCPMC6876677
OpenAlexW2966060723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.