ArticleInformation, communication and society2019
When Data Justice and Environmental Justice Meet: Formulating a Response to Extractive Logic through Environmental Data Justice.
Article in Information, communication and society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology With Environmental Exposures.Allergy · 2026Review
- Building trust with marginalized communities in participatory acoustic monitoring through dynamic consent.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- PMToxics · 2026Article
- Harmful Algae Forecasting through an Ocean Data Justice Lens.Environmental science & technology · 2025Review
- From 'safe haven' to 'zone of precarity': locating Istanbul through the perceptions and everyday urban practices of skilled migrants.Comparative migration studies · 2025Article
- A Multigenerational Model of Environmental Risk for Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) Children and Families.Environmental health perspectives · 2024Article
- Equitable infrastructure: Achieving resilient systems and restorative justice through policy and research innovation.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Equity and modeling in sustainability science: Examples and opportunities throughout the process.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Article
- Data justice and biodiversity conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022Article
- Taking the Long View for Oceans and Human Health Connection through Community Driven Science.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Article
- Machine Learning Within Studies of Early-Life Environmental Exposures and Child Health: Review of the Current Literature and Discussion of Next Steps.Current environmental health reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental data justice (EDJ) emerges from conversations between data justice and environmental justice while identifying the limits and tensions of these lenses. Through a reflexive process of querying our entanglement in non-innocent relations, this paper develops and engages EDJ by examining how it informs the work of the Environmental Data & Governance Initiative (EDGI), a distributed, consensus-based organization that formed in response to the 2016 US presidential election. Through grassroots archiving of data sets, monitoring federal environmental and energy agency websites, and writing rapid-response reports about how federal agencies are being undermined, EDGI mobilises EDJ to challenge the 'extractive logic' of current federal environmental policy and data infrastructures. 'Extractive logic' disconnects data from provenance, privileges the matrix of domination, and whitewashes data to generate uncertainty. We use the dynamic EDJ framework to reflect on EDGI's public comment advising against the US Environmental Protection Agency's proposed rule for Transparent Science. Through EDJ, EDGI aspires to create new environmental data infrastructures and practices that are participatory and embody equitable, transparent data care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.