Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31787752›Full record

ArticleThe pharmacogenomics journal2020

Pharmacogenomic biomarker information differences between drug labels in the United States and Hungary: implementation from medical practitioner view.

Reka Varnai, Istvan Szabo, Greta Tarlos, Laszlo Jozsef Szentpeteri, Attila Sik, Sandor Balogh, Csilla Sipeky

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Reka VarnaiDepartment of Primary Health Care, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7623, Pécs, Rákóczi u 2, Hungary.
Istvan SzaboInstitute of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Pécs, H-7624, Pécs, Ifjúság útja 6, Hungary.
Greta TarlosFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, H-7624, Pécs, Rokus u 2, Hungary.
Laszlo Jozsef SzentpeteriInstitute of Transdisciplinary Discoveries, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7624, Pécs, Szigeti út 12, Hungary.
Attila SikInstitute of Transdisciplinary Discoveries, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7624, Pécs, Szigeti út 12, Hungary.
Sandor BaloghDepartment of Primary Health Care, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7623, Pécs, Rákóczi u 2, Hungary.
Csilla SipekyInsitute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20520, Turku, Finland. csilla.sipeky@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8853-4722
University of Pecs · HUUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacogenomic biomarker availability of Hungarian Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPC) was assembled and compared with the information in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels of the same active substance (July 2019). The level of action of these biomarkers was assessed from The Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase database. From the identified 264 FDA approved drugs with pharmacogenomic biomarkers in drug label, 195 are available in Hungary. From them, 165 drugs include pharmacogenomic data disposing 222 biomarkers. Most of them are metabolizing enzymes (46%) and pharmacological targets (41%). The most frequent therapeutic area is oncology (37%), followed by infectious diseases (12%) and psychiatry (9%) (p < 0.00001). Most common biomarkers in Hungarian SmPCs are CYP2D6, CYP2C19, estrogen and progesterone hormone receptor (ESR, PGS). Importantly, US labels present more specific pharmacogenomic subheadings, the level of action has a different prominence, and offer more applicable dose modifications than Hungarians (5% vs 3%). However, Hungarian SmPCs are at 9 oncology drugs stricter than FDA, testing is obligatory before treatment. Out of the biomarkers available in US drug labels, 62 are missing completely from Hungarian SmPCs (p < 0.00001). Most of these belong to oncology (42%) and in case of 11% of missing biomarkers testing is required before treatment. In conclusion, more factual, clear, clinically relevant pharmacogenomic information in Hungarian SmPCs would reinforce implementation of pharmacogenetics. Underpinning future perspective is to support regulatory stakeholders to enhance inclusion of pharmacogenomic biomarkers into Hungarian drug labels and consequently enhance personalized medicine in Hungary.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDatabases, FactualDrug LabelingGeneral PractitionersHumansHungaryPharmacogeneticsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31787752
PMCPMC7253355
OpenAlexW2990786623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.