ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2020
Estimation of the Effectiveness of Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines by Distinguishing Between Influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 and Influenza A (H3N2) Using Rapid Influenza Diagnostic Tests During the 2018-2019 Season.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Timing of Assessment of Humoral and Cell-Mediated Immunity after Influenza Vaccination.Vaccines · 2024Article
- Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Persons Aged 15-64 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Vaccines · 2023Review
- Influenza Vaccination Effectiveness in Paediatric 'Healthy' Patients: A Population-Based Study in Italy.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Strategies for fighting pandemic virus infections: Integration of virology and drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022Review
- Differential Influence of Age on the Relationship between Genetic Mismatch and A(H1N1)pdm09 Vaccine Effectiveness.Viruses · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective To estimate the effectiveness of quadrivalent influenza vaccines during the 2018-2019 season for influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 and A (H3N2) in all age groups. Methods A test-negative case-control study was performed. Patients A total of 1,331 participants were divided into 4 groups (younger children: ≤6 years, older children: 7-15 years, younger adults: 16-64 years, and older adults: ≥65 years). Results For all children, the adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE) was significant against any influenza [41.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 19.7-57.2%)], total A [A (H1N1) pdm09 and (H3N2); 38.3% (95% CI: 15.1-55.1%)], and A [H3N2; 39.8% (95% CI: 13.8-57.9%)]. In younger children, the adjusted VE against any influenza was 44.8% (95% CI: 14.1-64.5%) and against total A was 43.8% (95% CI: 12.5-63.9%). For all adults, the adjusted VE was significant against any influenza was 42.3% (95% CI: 17.9-59.5%); total A, 39.3% (95% CI: 13.5-57.4%); A (H1N1) pdm09, 56.7% (95% CI: 19.1-76.8%); and A (H3N2), 33.2% (95% CI: 1.5-54.6%). In younger adults, the adjusted VE against any influenza was 43.4% (95% CI: 17.3-61.2%), total A, 41.7% (95% CI: 14.4-60.3%); A (H1N1) pdm09, 56.2% (95% CI: 14.9-77.5%); and A (H3N2), 34.5% (95% CI: 0.3-56.9%). In both older children and older adults, no significant VE was observed. Conclusion This study is the first to report on the VE against all types of influenza in all age groups using a rapid influenza diagnostic test. The VE varied with both age and influenza subtype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.