Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31787086›Full record

Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019

Back beliefs in patients with low back pain: a primary care cohort study.

Søren Grøn, Rikke Krüger Jensen, Tue Secher Jensen, Alice Kongsted

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Primary Investigation of Low Back Pain among Saudi Arabians: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Søren GrønNordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Syddansk Universitet, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark. soerengroenkiropraktor@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9804-8173
Rikke Krüger JensenNordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Syddansk Universitet, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Tue Secher JensenNordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Syddansk Universitet, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Alice KongstedNordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Syddansk Universitet, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Back Belief Questionnaire (BBQ) measures beliefs about negative consequences of back pain. The aim of this study was to describe the back beliefs of a large clinical population with low back pain (LBP), to investigate the associations between back beliefs and patient characteristics when care-seeking, and between on-going pain and back beliefs at follow up.

methodsPatients aged over 18, consulting with LBP with or without radicular pain of all symptom durations, were recruited from chiropractic clinics. The BBQ was completed on the first visit and at 3- and 12-month follow-ups. Sociodemographic- and symptom-related questions were answered at baseline. A BBQ sum score was calculated at all three time points, and linear regression was used to analyse the cross-sectional association between baseline patient characteristics and BBQ scores. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test differences in BBQ scores for patients with and without on-going LBP at 3- and 12-months follow up.

resultsThe baseline population consisted of 2295 participants. The median BBQ sum scores at baseline, 3 and 12 months had interquartile ranges of 33 [29-36], 33 [29-37], and 31 [27-35] respectively. Patient characteristics and symptoms were associated with baseline BBQ scores (p < 0.05), but most association were weak. The strongest association was with severe disability (4.0 points (95% CI 3.3-4.6) lower BBQ than no disability). Negative beliefs were related to more severe LBP at baseline and with on-going pain at follow up.

conclusionAt a population level, back beliefs were generally positive and relatively constant over time, but misconceptions about a poor prognosis were common. Studies exploring individual patterns of back beliefs and associations with clinical outcomes over time are recommended.

Indexed as

CultureHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareYoung AdultBack beliefsBack painPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID31787086
PMCPMC6886198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.