Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31787037›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Impact of mitonuclear interactions on life-history responses to diet.

M Florencia Camus, Michael O'Leary, Max Reuter, Nick Lane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The role of mitonuclear incompatibilities in allopatric speciation.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Massive gene rearrangement in mitogenomes of phytoseiid mites.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M Florencia CamusResearch Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Michael O'LearyResearch Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Max ReuterResearch Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Nick LaneResearch Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S003681/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondria are central to both energy metabolism and biosynthesis. Mitochondrial function could therefore influence resource allocation. Critically, mitochondrial function depends on interactions between proteins encoded by the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Severe incompatibilities between these genomes can have pervasive effects on both fitness and longevity. How milder deficits in mitochondrial function affect life-history trade-offs is less well understood. Here, we analyse how mitonuclear interactions affect the trade-off between fecundity and longevity in

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusDietDNA, MitochondrialDrosophila melanogasterFemaleFertilityHaplotypesLife History TraitsLongevityMaleMitochondriaDNA, Mitochondrialfecunditylife-history trade-offlongevitymitonuclear interactionsnutritionresource allocation

Identifiers

PMID31787037
PMCPMC6939373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.