Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31786936›Full record

SynthesisJournal of behavioral addictions2019

Linking parental mediation practices to adolescents' problematic online screen use: A systematic literature review.

Philip Nielsen, Nicolas Favez, Howard Liddle, Henk Rigter

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Problematic Media Use among Children up to the Age of 10: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. What Is Digital Parenting? A Systematic Review of Past Measurement and Blueprint for the Future.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Intergenerational Co-parenting and Children's Screen Use: A Scoping Review.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unfiltered Access, Unseen Harms: A Developmental and Public Health Critique of Digital Rights Discourse.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philip NielsenCentre Mail, Fondation Phénix, Geneva,Switzerland.
Nicolas FavezUnité de Psychologie Clinique des Relations Interpersonnelles, FPSE,Université de Genève, Geneva,Switzerland.
Howard LiddleDepartments of Public Health Sciences and Psychology, Center for Treatment Research on Adolescent Drug Abuse,University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL,USA.
Henk RigterDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden,The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsTo remedy problematic Internet use (PIU) and problematic online gaming (POG) in adolescents, much is expected from efforts by parents to help youths to contain their screen use. Such parental mediation can include (a) refraining from acting, (b) co-viewing or co-gaming with the teen, (c) active mediation, and (d) restrictive mediation. We evaluated if parental mediation practices are linked to PIU and POG in adolescents.

methodsFor a systematic literature review, we searched for publications presenting survey data and relating parental mediation practices to levels of PIU and/or POG in adolescents. The review's selection criteria were met by 18 PIU and 9 POG publications, reporting on 81.002 and 12.915 adolescents, respectively. We extracted data on gaming problems, mediation interventions, study design features, and sample characteristics.

resultsNo type of parental mediation was consistently associated with lower or elevated problematic screen use rates in the adolescents. Refraining from parental mediation tended to aggravate screen use problems, whereas active mediation (talking to the teen) may mitigate such problems in PIU, but less clearly in POG. The link of restrictive mediation with problematic screen use varied from positive to negative, possibly depending on type of restriction. In both PIU and POG, family cohesion was related to lower rates of the problem behavior concerned and family conflict to higher rates. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsParental mediation practices may affect problematic screen use rates for better or worse. However, research of higher quality, including observations of parent-teen interactions, is needed to confirm the trends noted and advance the critical issue of the possible association between PIU, POG, and family interactions.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorBehavior, AddictiveInternetParentingScreen TimeVideo GamesAdolescentHumansadolescentsfamily cohesionparental mediationproblematic Internet useproblematic online gamingsystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID31786936
PMCPMC7044585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.