Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31786676›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia2020

Practical guide for safe central venous catheterization and management 2017.

Safety Committee of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06652191 (Effect of Central Venous Puncture Dilation and Non Dilation on the Success Rate of Catheterization), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06652191 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Central Venous Puncture Dilation and Non Dilation on the Success Rate of Catheterization

TypeinterventionalSponsorSixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled336Conditionsthe Success Rate of Non Dilation on the Central Venous CatheterizationArmsDirect catheterization with non-dilation, Catheterization after expanding the skin with a dilator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Internal Jugular Vein Size and Thrombosis Risk in Central Venous Catheterization.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Safety Committee of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central venous catheterization is a basic skill applicable in various medical fields. However, because it may occasionally cause lethal complications, we developed this practical guide that will help a novice operator successfully perform central venous catheterization using ultrasound guidance. The focus of this practical guide is patient safety. It details the fundamental knowledge and techniques that are indispensable for performing ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization (other choices of indwelling catheters, subclavian, axillary, and femoral venous catheter, or peripherally inserted central venous catheter are also described in alternatives).

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralCatheters, IndwellingHumansJugular VeinsCatheter-related infectionMechanical complicationMedical educationPediatricUltrasound-guided central venous catheterization

Identifiers

PMID31786676
PMCPMC7223734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.