Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31786616›Full record

GuidelineEuropean radiology2020

Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast-a consensus and mission statement from the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group.

Pascal Baltzer, Ritse M Mann, Mami Iima, Eric E Sigmund, Paola Clauser, Fiona J Gilbert, Laura Martincich, Savannah C Partridge, Andrew Patterson, Katja Pinker and 4 more

Abstract readConsensus StatementPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 215 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
215citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

215 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Diffusion MRI of the Body: Beyond PGSE-EPI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

155 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pascal BaltzerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna General Hospital, Wien, Austria.
Ritse M MannDepartment of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands. ritse.mann@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-1930
Mami IimaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Eric E SigmundDepartment of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, Ney York, NY, 10016, USA.
Paola ClauserDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna General Hospital, Wien, Austria.
Fiona J GilbertDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Laura MartincichSOC Radiodiagnostica, ASL AT, Asti, Italy.
Savannah C PartridgeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Andrew PattersonDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Katja PinkerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna General Hospital, Wien, Austria.
Fabienne ThibaultInstitut Curie, Paris, France.
Julia Camps-HerreroRibera Salud Hospitals, Valencia, Spain.
Denis Le BihanNeuroSpin, Frédéric Joliot Institute, Gif Sur Yvette, France.
EUSOBI international Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Society of Breast Radiology (EUSOBI) established an International Breast DWI working group. The working group consists of clinical breast MRI experts, MRI physicists, and representatives from large vendors of MRI equipment, invited based upon proven expertise in breast MRI and/or in particular breast DWI, representing 25 sites from 16 countries. The aims of the working group are (a) to promote the use of breast DWI into clinical practice by issuing consensus statements and initiate collaborative research where appropriate; (b) to define necessary standards and provide practical guidance for clinical application of breast DWI; (c) to develop a standardized and translatable multisite multivendor quality assurance protocol, especially for multisite research studies; (d) to find consensus on optimal methods for image processing/analysis, visualization, and interpretation; and (e) to work collaboratively with system vendors to improve breast DWI sequences. First consensus recommendations, presented in this paper, include acquisition parameters for standard breast DWI sequences including specifications of b values, fat saturation, spatial resolution, and repetition and echo times. To describe lesions in an objective way, levels of diffusion restriction/hindrance in the breast have been defined based on the published literature on breast DWI. The use of a small ROI placed on the darkest part of the lesion on the ADC map, avoiding necrotic, noisy or non-enhancing lesion voxels is currently recommended. The working group emphasizes the need for standardization and quality assurance before ADC thresholds are applied. The working group encourages further research in advanced diffusion techniques and tailored DWI strategies for specific indications. Key Points • The working group considers breast DWI an essential part of a multiparametric breast MRI protocol and encourages its use. • Basic requirements for routine clinical application of breast DWI are provided, including recommendations on b values, fat saturation, spatial resolution, and other sequence parameters. • Diffusion levels in breast lesions are defined based on meta-analysis data and methods to obtain a reliable ADC value are detailed.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsConsensusDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersBreastBreast neoplasmsConsensusDiffusion magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID31786616
PMCPMC7033067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.