Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31786414›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2020

Risk stratification in luminal-type breast cancer: Comparison of Ki-67 with EndoPredict test results.

Aurelia Noske, Sophie-Isabelle Anders, Johannes Ettl, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Katja Steiger, Katja Specht, Wilko Weichert, Marion Kiechle, Evelyn Klein

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Use of the Gene Expression Test ProsignaBreast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aurelia NoskeInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Germany. Electronic address: aurelia.noske@tum.de.
Sophie-Isabelle AndersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Johannes EttlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander HapfelmeierInstitute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Katja SteigerInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Germany.
Katja SpechtInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Germany.
Wilko WeichertInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Germany.
Marion KiechleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Evelyn KleinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAdjuvant chemotherapy decision in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer (BC) is challenging. Ki-67 is widely used for adjuvant therapy decision in BC. The multigene assay EndoPredict (EP) has shown to provide valid and additional information about the risk of recurrence compared to traditional pathological factors. In this study, we compared Ki-67 with EP assay generated risk groups.

methodsWe analyzed the results from prospective EP testing (n = 373) and tumor proliferation assessed by Ki-67 staining in luminal breast cancer. We statistically investigated the association of both parameters and probed for equivalence in risk stratification.

resultsEvaluation of Ki-67 was feasible in 307 (82%) BC specimens with known EP test results. The EPscore (now called 12-gene molecular score) delineated 140 low and 167 high scores. After combining the EPscore with pathological tumor stage and nodal status, we received 203 EPclin low-risk and 104 EPclin high-risk classifications. EPscore and EPclin were significantly associated with Ki-67 indices and tumor grade (p < 0.001). Overall, we observed a moderate correlation between Ki-67 and the EPscore (r = 0.63) as well as the EPclin score (r = 0.59).

conclusionKi-67 values above 25% partly overlap with EP test results and therefore indicate a high-risk profile. In these cases, the additional prognostic information from EP testing might be rather low. However, low and intermediate Ki-67 values (less than 25%) alone were not reliable in predicting a low risk EP profile, indicating that EP testing is useful in this subgroup.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Decision-MakingFemaleGenetic TestingHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedPathology, MolecularPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorKi-67 AntigenReceptors, EstrogenBreast cancerEndoPredictKi-67Luminal-typeRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID31786414
PMCPMC7375593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.