Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31786062›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2019

Genetic Reprogramming of Positional Memory in a Regenerating Appendage.

Ying-Ting Wang, Tzu-Lun Tseng, Yu-Chia Kuo, Jr-Kai Yu, Yi-Hsien Su, Kenneth D Poss, Chen-Hui Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Signal control during tissue regeneration in adult animals.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Thyroid hormone regulates proximodistal patterning in fin rays.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Voltage-gated sodium channelProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ying-Ting WangInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
Tzu-Lun TsengInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
Yu-Chia KuoInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
Jr-Kai YuInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
Yi-Hsien SuInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
Kenneth D PossDepartment of Cell Biology, Regeneration Next, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Chen-Hui ChenInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan. Electronic address: chcchen@gate.sinica.edu.tw.

Funding

Regulation of Appendage Regeneration in ZebrafishR01GM074057 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POSS, KENNETH D · 2006 to 2017
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certain vertebrates such as salamanders and zebrafish are able to regenerate complex tissues (e.g., limbs and fins) with remarkable fidelity. However, how positional information of the missing structure is recalled by appendage stump cells has puzzled researchers for centuries. Here, we report that sizing information for adult zebrafish tailfins is encoded within proliferating blastema cells during a critical period of regeneration. Using a chemical mutagenesis screen, we identified a temperature-sensitive allele of the gene encoding DNA polymerase alpha subunit 2 (pola2) that disrupts fin regeneration in zebrafish. Temperature shift assays revealed a 48-h window of regeneration, during which positional identities could be disrupted in pola2 mutants, leading to regeneration of miniaturized appendages. These fins retained memory of the new size in subsequent rounds of amputation and regeneration. Similar effects were observed upon transient genetic or pharmacological disruption of progenitor cell proliferation after plucking of zebrafish scales or head or tail amputation in amphioxus and annelids. Our results provide evidence that positional information in regenerating tissues is not hardwired but malleable, based on regulatory mechanisms that appear to be evolutionarily conserved across distantly related phyla.

Indexed as

Animal FinsAnimalsCell LineageDNA Polymerase IOrgan SizeRegenerationSignal TransductionTemperatureZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsDNA Polymerase IZebrafish Proteinsforward geneticspola2positional informationregenerationzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID31786062
PMCPMC6917923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.