Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31785830›Full record

Trial reportRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2020

Synchronous versus sequential chemo-radiotherapy in patients with early stage breast cancer (SECRAB): A randomised, phase III, trial.

Indrajit N Fernando, Sarah J Bowden, Kathryn Herring, Cassandra L Brookes, Ikhlaaq Ahmed, Andrea Marshall, Robert Grieve, Mark Churn, David Spooner, Talaat N Latief and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00003893 (Sequencing of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Adjuvant Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00003893 phase3completednot on this map

Sequencing of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Adjuvant Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital BirminghamRan1998 to 2006Enrolled2,250ConditionsBreast CancerArmsCMF regimen, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, epirubicin hydrochloride, fluorouracil
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Post-neoadjuvant treatment with capecitabine and trastuzumab emtansine in breast cancer patients-sequentially, or better simultaneously?Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Detailed Sub-study Analysis of the SECRAB Trial: Quality of Life, Cosmesis and Chemotherapy Dose Intensity.Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Indrajit N FernandoCancer Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Indrajit.Fernando@uhb.nhs.uk.
Sarah J BowdenCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Kathryn HerringCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Cassandra L BrookesLeicester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Ikhlaaq AhmedCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Andrea MarshallWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Robert GrieveOncology Unit, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, University Hospital, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Mark ChurnClinical Oncology, Worcestershire Royal Hospital, Worcester, United Kingdom.
David SpoonerCancer Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Talaat N LatiefCancer Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Rajiv K AgrawalThe Shrewsbury and Telford NHS Trust, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom.
Adrian M BruntCancer Centre, Royal Stoke University Hospital & Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Andrea StevensCancer Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Andrew GoodmanOncology Unit, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torbay Hospital, Torquay, United Kingdom.
Peter CanneyBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Jill BishopNorth Wales Cancer Treatment Centre, Glan Clwyd Hospital, United Kingdom.
Diana RitchieBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Janet DunnWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Christopher J PooleOncology Unit, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, University Hospital, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Daniel W ReaCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
SECRAB Investigators

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19733Cancer Research UK 25354Cancer Research UK CR UK/98/001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal sequence of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for breast cancer is unknown. SECRAB assesses whether local control can be improved without increased toxicity.

methodsSECRAB was a prospective, open-label, multi-centre, phase III trial comparing synchronous to sequential chemo-radiotherapy, conducted in 48 UK centres. Patients with invasive, early stage breast cancer were eligible. Randomisation (performed using random permuted block assignment) was stratified by centre, axillary surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy boost. Permitted chemotherapy regimens included CMF and anthracycline-CMF. Synchronous radiotherapy was administered between cycles two and three for CMF or five and six for anthracycline-CMF. Sequential radiotherapy was delivered on chemotherapy completion. Radiotherapy schedules included 40 Gy/15F over three weeks, and 50 Gy/25F over five weeks. The primary outcome was local recurrence at five and ten years, defined as time to local recurrence, and analysed by intention to treat. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00003893.

findingsBetween 02-July-1998 and 25-March-2004, 2297 patients were recruited (1150 synchronous and 1146 sequential). Baseline characteristics were balanced. With 10.2 years median follow-up, the ten-year local recurrence rates were 4.6% and 7.1% in the synchronous and sequential arms respectively (hazard ratio (HR) 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-0.90; p = 0.012). In a planned sub-group analysis of anthracycline-CMF, the ten-year local recurrence rates difference were 3.5% versus 6.7% respectively (HR 0.48 95% CI: 0.26-0.88; p = 0.018). There was no significant difference in overall or disease-free survival. 24% of patients on the synchronous arm suffered moderate/severe acute skin reactions compared to 15% on the sequential arm (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in late adverse effects apart from telangiectasia (p = 0.03).

interpretationSynchronous chemo-radiotherapy significantly improved local recurrence rates. This was delivered with an acceptable increase in acute toxicity. The greatest benefit of synchronous chemo-radiation was in patients treated with anthracycline-CMF.

fundingCancer Research UK (CR UK/98/001) and Pharmacia.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantCisplatinDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorouracilHumansMethotrexateMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesAnthracyclinesCisplatinFluorouracilMethotrexateBreast cancerChemo-radiotherapyClinical trialRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31785830
PMCPMC7005671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.