Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31785255›Full record

ArticleChest2020

Responsiveness of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Treatment Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and OSA.

Lucas M Donovan, Lan Yu, Suzanne M Bertisch, Daniel J Buysse, Michael Rueschman, Sanjay R Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucas M DonovanUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: ldonovan@u.washington.edu.
Lan YuUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Suzanne M BertischBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Daniel J BuysseUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Michael RueschmanBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Sanjay R PatelUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR002541 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2018 to 2022
$93.0M
Mentored Patient Oriented Research in Sleep and Metabolic DiseaseK24HL127307 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PATEL, SANJAY R · 2015 to 2019
$582k
Predictors, consequences, and motivations of benzodiazepine use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseF32HL140685 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DONOVAN, LUCAS MATTHEW · 2018 to 2018
$55k
Redesigning Medical specialty Outpatient DELivery through virtual SLEEP care (REMODEL-SLEEP)IK2HX002816 · VA · VA PUGET SOUND HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI DONOVAN, LUCAS MATTHEW · 2020 to 2024
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX002816NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002541NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL140685NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL127307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) includes two instruments to quantify sleep symptoms (sleep disturbance [SDA] and sleep-related impairment [SRI]) in diverse populations across a wide symptom spectrum. However, the responsiveness of PROMIS measures to treatment of sleep disorders is unknown. We examined the responsiveness of the PROMIS sleep scales to the treatment of OSA.

methodsWe collected SDA, SRI, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) before and after initiation of positive airway pressure (PAP) in patients with type 2 diabetes newly diagnosed with OSA. To compare responsiveness, we compared effect sizes and classifications of symptom improvement using both the reliable change method and thresholds of minimum important difference (MID).

resultsA total of 103 patients completed assessments pre- and post-PAP. SDA, SRI, and ESS scores all declined significantly with PAP therapy. We observed the largest effect size for SDA (-0.64; 95% CI, -0.86 to -0.42), followed by SRI (-0.43; 95% CI, -0.63 to -0.23), and ESS (-0.28; 95% CI, -0.42 to -0.15). More patients experienced the reliable change category of symptom remission categorized by the PROMIS measures (SDA: 23.3%; SRI: 31.1%) relative to the ESS (5.8%) (P < .001 for both). Using the MID, SDA and SRI also classified more patients as improved (SDA: 54.4%; SRI: 49.5%) relative to the ESS (35.0%) (P < .001 for both pairwise comparisons).

conclusionsPROMIS sleep measures were more likely than the ESS to detect an improvement with PAP therapy. Incorporating PROMIS measures into research and clinical care may provide a more sensitive assessment of symptomatic response to OSA treatment.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressurePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceReproducibility of ResultsSleep Apnea, ObstructiveSleepinessTreatment Outcomemeasure responsivenessOSApatient-reported outcomessleepinesssleep-related impairment

Identifiers

PMID31785255
PMCPMC7609963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.