Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31785185›Full record

ArticleArthritis care & research2020

Outcome Measures in Large Vessel Vasculitis: Relationship Between Patient-, Physician-, Imaging-, and Laboratory-Based Assessments.

Casey A Rimland, Kaitlin A Quinn, Joel S Rosenblum, Mollie N Schwartz, K Bates Gribbons, Elaine Novakovich, Antoine G Sreih, Peter A Merkel, Mark A Ahlman, Peter C Grayson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis care & research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Management of Takayasu Arteritis - A 2026 Update.Current rheumatology reports · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Large-vessel vasculitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  16. Application progress of multiple imaging modalities in Takayasu arteritis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Casey A RimlandNIH, Bethesda, Maryland, and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.ORCID 0000-0002-5187-6921
Kaitlin A QuinnNIH, Bethesda, Maryland, and MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Joel S RosenblumNIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mollie N SchwartzNIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
K Bates GribbonsNIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Elaine NovakovichNIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Antoine G SreihUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID 0000-0002-7864-0185
Peter A MerkelUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Mark A AhlmanNIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Peter C GraysonNIH, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-8269-9438
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USGeorgetown University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Vasculitis and Translational MedicineZIAAR041204 · NIAMS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES · PI GRAYSON, PETER · 2015 to 2025
$15.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AR999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the relationship between measures of disease assessment in patients with large vessel vasculitis.

methodsPatients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) or Takayasu arteritis (TAK) were recruited into a prospective, observational cohort. Assessments within the following outcomes were independently recorded: 1) patient-reported outcomes (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, patient global assessment of disease activity [PtGA], Short Form 36 health survey [SF-36], Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire), 2) physician global assessment of disease activity (PhGA), 3) laboratory outcomes (C-reactive protein [CRP] level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]), and 4) imaging outcomes (PETVAS, a qualitative score of vascular

resultsAnalyses were performed on 112 patients (GCA = 56, TAK = 56), over 296 visits, with a median follow-up of 6 months. Correlation network analysis revealed assessment measures clustered independently by type of outcome. PhGA was centrally linked to all other outcome types, but correlations were modest (ρ = 0.12-0.32; P < 0.05). PETVAS, CRP level, and PtGA were independently associated with clinically active disease. All 4 patient-reported outcomes strongly correlated with each other (ρ = 0.35-0.60; P < 0.0001). Patient-reported outcomes were not correlated with PETVAS, and only PtGA correlated with CRP level (ρ = 0.16; P < 0.01). Patients whose clinical assessment changed from active disease to remission (n = 29) had a corresponding significant decrease in ESR, CRP level, and PETVAS at the remission visit. Patients whose clinical assessment changed from remission to active disease (n = 11) had a corresponding significant increase in CRP level and PtGA at the active visit.

conclusionMeasures of disease assessment in large vessel vasculitis consist of independent, yet complementary, outcomes, supporting the need to develop composite outcome measures or a standard set of measures covering multiple types of outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleGiant Cell ArteritisHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePositron-Emission TomographyProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTakayasu ArteritisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31785185
PMCPMC7260082
OpenAlexW2990090586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.