Trial reportDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2020
Use of the Dyskinesia Impairment Scale in non-ambulatory dyskinetic cerebral palsy.
Trial report in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess the responsiveness, concurrent validity, and feasibility of the Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS) in non-ambulatory patients with dyskinetic cerebral palsy (CP).
methodThe study is a secondary analysis of data collected in the IDYS trial, a randomized controlled trial on the effects of intrathecal baclofen (ITB). The DIS and Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale (BADS) were conducted at baseline and after 3 months of ITB or placebo treatment. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing the effect sizes and correlation of change after treatment between the DIS and BADS. Concurrent validity was evaluated by assessing the correlations between scales. Feasibility was evaluated for each DIS item by the number of participants who successfully accomplished the item.
resultsThirty-three non-ambulatory patients (9 females, 24 males) with dyskinetic CP (ITB-treated: n=17, mean [SD] age: 14y 1mo [4y 1mo]; placebo-treated: n=16, mean [SD] age: 14y 7mo [4y]) were included in the study. The effect sizes for BADS and DIS were similar in The ITB-treated group (-0.29 and -0.22 respectively). Changes after treatment on the DIS dystonia subscale correlated with changes on the BADS (r=0.64; p<0.001). The DIS dystonia subscale and BADS correlated at baseline and follow-up (r=0.78; p<0.001 and r=0.79; p<0.001). Not all DIS activity items could be performed in this sample of patients.
interpretationFor non-ambulatory patients with dyskinetic CP, the responsiveness of the DIS equalled the responsiveness of BADS. Concurrent validity was adequate. Feasibility for activity items was restricted in patients with severe dyskinetic CP. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: The Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS) and Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale showed similar responsiveness in non-ambulatory patients with dyskinetic cerebral palsy (CP). No floor or ceiling effect was observed for DIS in non-ambulatory participants. The concurrent validity of DIS was adequate in non-ambulatory participants. Patients with dyskinetic CP in Gross Motor Function Classification System levels IV and V could not perform all DIS activity items.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.