Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31784984›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2020

Expression profiling of single cells and patient cohorts identifies multiple immunosuppressive pathways and an altered NK cell phenotype in glioblastoma.

H J Close, L F Stead, J Nsengimana, K A Reilly, A Droop, H Wurdak, R K Mathew, R Corns, J Newton-Bishop, A A Melcher and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CD39Science translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. NK cell-based tumor immunotherapy.Bioactive materials · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H J CloseLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds School of Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0352-098X
L F SteadLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds School of Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9550-4150
J NsengimanaLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds School of Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
K A ReillyLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds School of Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
A DroopMRC Medical Bioinformatics Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7695-7480
H WurdakLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds School of Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4385-4324
R K MathewLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds School of Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2609-9876
R CornsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
J Newton-BishopLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds School of Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
A A MelcherInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2042-3380
S C ShortLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds School of Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4423-7256
G P Cook *Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds School of Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0223-3652
E B Wilson *Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds School of Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0441-728X
University of Leeds · GBLeeds General Infirmary · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11963Cancer Research UK 19167Cancer Research UK 21855Cancer Research UK C37059/A16369Cancer Research UK C588/A19167Medical Research Council MR/L01629X/1Medical Research Council MR/S00386X/1Medical Research Council MR/S00386X/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive cancer with a very poor prognosis. Generally viewed as weakly immunogenic, GBM responds poorly to current immunotherapies. To understand this problem more clearly we used a combination of natural killer (NK) cell functional assays together with gene and protein expression profiling to define the NK cell response to GBM and explore immunosuppression in the GBM microenvironment. In addition, we used transcriptome data from patient cohorts to classify GBM according to immunological profiles. We show that glioma stem-like cells, a source of post-treatment tumour recurrence, express multiple immunomodulatory cell surface molecules and are targeted in preference to normal neural progenitor cells by natural killer (NK) cells ex vivo. In contrast, GBM-infiltrating NK cells express reduced levels of activation receptors within the tumour microenvironment, with hallmarks of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β-mediated inhibition. This NK cell inhibition is accompanied by expression of multiple immune checkpoint molecules on T cells. Single-cell transcriptomics demonstrated that both tumour and haematopoietic-derived cells in GBM express multiple, diverse mediators of immune evasion. Despite this, immunome analysis across a patient cohort identifies a spectrum of immunological activity in GBM, with active immunity marked by co-expression of immune effector molecules and feedback inhibitory mechanisms. Our data show that GBM is recognized by the immune system but that anti-tumour immunity is restrained by multiple immunosuppressive pathways, some of which operate in the healthy brain. The presence of immune activity in a subset of patients suggests that these patients will more probably benefit from combination immunotherapies directed against multiple immunosuppressive pathways.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCells, CulturedCohort StudiesCytotoxicity, ImmunologicGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksGlioblastomaHumansImmune ToleranceKiller Cells, NaturalNeoplastic Stem CellsPhenotypePrognosisSignal Transductionglioblastomaimmune-inhibitionNK cells

Identifiers

PMID31784984
PMCPMC7066386
OpenAlexW2990269792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.