ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2019
Functioning of plant-bacterial associations under osmotic stress in vitro.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Multiomics Analysis of the Heat Stress Response ofBiomolecules · 2023Article
- Rhizobacteria Inoculation Effects on Phytohormone Status of Potato Microclones Cultivated In Vitro under Osmotic Stress.Biomolecules · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The search for effective plant-growth-promoting strains of rhizospheric bacteria that would ensure the resistance of plant-microbial associations to environmental stressors is essential for the design of environmentally friendly agrobiotechnologies. We investigated the interaction of potato (cv. Nevsky) microplants with the plant-growth-promoting bacteria Azospirillum brasilense Sp245 and Ochrobactrum cytisi IPA7.2 under osmotic stress in vitro. The bacteria improved the physiological and biochemical variables of the microplants, significantly increasing shoot length and root number (1.3-fold, on average). Inoculation also led a more effective recovery of the plants after stress. During repair, inoculation contributed to a decreased leaf content of malonic dialdehyde. With A. brasilense Sp245, the decrease was 1.75-fold; with O. cytisi IPA7.2, it was 1.4-fold. During repair, the shoot length, node number, and root number of the inoculated plants were greater than the control values by an average of 1.3-fold with A. brasilense Sp245 and by an average of 1.6-fold with O. cytisi IPA7.2. O. cytisi IPA7.2, previously isolated from the potato rhizosphere, protected the physiological and biochemical processes in the plants under stress and repair better than did A. brasilense Sp245. Specifically, root weight increased fivefold during repair, as compared to the noninoculated plants, while chlorophyll a content remained at the level found in the nonstressed controls. The results indicate that these bacteria can be used as components of biofertilizers. A. brasilense Sp245 has favorable prospects for use in temperate latitudes, whereas O. cytisi IPA7.2 can be successfully used in saline and drought-stressed environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31784916What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.