Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31784873›Full record

ReviewDrugs2020

Treating Persistent Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery.

James S Khan, Karim S Ladha, Faraj Abdallah, Hance Clarke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Virtual Reality as a Promising Tool Supporting Oncological Treatment in Breast Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. A Resilience Framework for Research in Oncology Massage Therapy.International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

James S KhanDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Karim S LadhaDepartment of Anaesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Faraj AbdallahDepartment of Anaesthesia, Ottawa University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Hance ClarkeDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Pain Research Unit, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada. hance.clarke@uhn.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4975-3823
Mount Sinai Hospital · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers among women, and since the prognosis of breast cancer has substantially improved in past decades, complications of management are becoming increasingly apparent. Persistent pain lasting greater than 3 months after breast cancer surgery is unfortunately a common complication affecting approximately 30% of patients after tumour resection. Persistent breast cancer pain has neuropathic features and is typically mild-to-moderate in intensity, with approximately 10% suffering from severe pain. There is an increasing need to prevent persistent pain through the use of transitional pain programmes and perioperative interventions, and to identify novel treatment modalities to reduce suffering in those who unfortunately develop persistent pain. This review serves to provide an overview on persistent pain after breast cancer surgery, its pathophysiology, and current management strategies.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChronic PainFemaleHumansMastectomyPostoperative PainSeverity of Illness IndexTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31784873
OpenAlexW2991537174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.