ReviewHeart failure reviews2020
The pivotal role of cardiovascular imaging in the identification and risk stratification of non-compaction cardiomyopathy patients.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The spongy heart paradox: balancing bleeding and clotting risk in left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Unmasking the Apex: Multimodality Imaging for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Apical Obliteration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- How to Approach Left Ventricular Hypertrabeculation: A Practical Guide and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Behind Enemy Lines: Vital Echocardiographic Data Prior to Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Left Ventricular Non-Compaction Cardiomyopathy-Still More Questions than Answers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Left ventricular noncompaction highlighted by three-dimensional and speckle tracking echocardiography.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2022Article
- Effect of trabeculated myocardial mass on left ventricle global and regional functions in noncompaction cardiomyopathy.World journal of cardiology · 2021Article
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance clarifies arrhythmogenicity in asymptomatic young athletes with ventricular arrhythmias undergoing pre-participation evaluation.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-compaction cardiomyopathy (NCM) is a heterogeneous myocardial disease that can finally lead to heart failure, arrhythmias, and/or embolic events. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment is of paramount importance. Furthermore, genetic assessment and counseling are crucial for individual risk assessment and family planning. Echocardiography is the first-line imaging modality. However, it is hampered by interobserver variability, depends among others on the quality of the acoustic window, cannot assess reliably the right ventricle and the apex, and cannot provide tissue characterization. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides a 3D approach allowing imaging of the entire heart, including both left and right ventricle, with low operator variability or limitations due to patient's body structure. Furthermore, tissue characterization, using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), allows the detection of fibrotic areas possibly representing the substrate for potentially lethal arrhythmias, predicts the severity of LV systolic dysfunction, and differentiates apical thrombus from fibrosis. Conversely, besides being associated with high costs, CMR has long acquisition/processing times, lack of expertise among cardiologists/radiologists, and limited availability. Additionally, in cases of respiratory and/or cardiac motion artifacts or arrhythmias, the cine images may be blurred. However, CMR cannot be applied to patients with not CMR-compatible implanted devices and LGE may be not available in patients with severely reduced GFR. Nevertheless, native T1 mapping can provide detailed tissue characterization in such cases. This tremendous potential of CMR makes this modality the ideal tool for better risk stratification of NCM patient, based not only on functional but also on tissue characterization information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.