Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31784815›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2020

Contribution of iodized salt to total iodine and total salt intake in Germany.

Jonas Esche, Michael Thamm, Thomas Remer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effect of sodium restriction on iodine prophylaxis: a review.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Salt reduction and iodine intake in Italy.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonas EscheDONALD Study Center Dortmund, IEL-Nutritional Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Dortmund, Germany.
Michael ThammDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas RemerDONALD Study Center Dortmund, IEL-Nutritional Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Dortmund, Germany. remer@uni-bonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0241-1909
University of Bonn · DERobert Koch Institute · DE

Funding

This work was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) based on a decision of the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany, granted by the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE; grant number 2817HS007). DEGS1 was fin 2817HS007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSalt reduction campaigns without a parallel increase of iodine fortification will lead to a worsened iodine status in countries with a relevant salt iodization. A decline in iodine supply bears the risk of higher prevalences of goiter, thyroid nodules, and cognitive delay in children. Against this background, we analyzed the contribution of iodized salt to total iodine and salt intake in Germany and compared the results with data from Switzerland.

methodsAnalyses were performed with data of the representative German Health-Interview and Examination-Survey for Adults (DEGS1, 2008-2011) using spot urine measurements of creatinine, iodine, and sodium (n = 6738). Median daily iodine and salt intakes were calculated by estimating 24-h iodine and sodium excretions from urinary analyte/creatinine ratios. Linear regressions were used to deduce iodine intake that originates from iodine containing foods (i.e., salt-independent iodine). From this, ingested iodine originating from salt and the proportion of iodized salt to total salt intake were calculated. Data from Switzerland were obtained from the literature.

resultsIn Germany, only 42% (52.2 µg/d) of the predicted median total iodine intake (126.2 µg/d), i.e., 12% less than in Switzerland, were found to originate from salt, whereas 73.7 µg/d came from iodine containing foods. 28% (2.6 g/d) of the median salt intake (9.3 g/d) of the German population was calculated to represent iodized salt against 43% in Switzerland.

conclusionsAlong with an almost identical inherent iodine intake in Germany and Switzerland, the average total iodine intake, the contribution of iodized salt to total iodine intake, and the proportion of iodized salt to total salt are higher in Switzerland than in Germany. Despite this, iodine fortification of table salt has recently been increased in Switzerland from 20 to 25 mg/kg to ensure iodine sufficiency in the population, whereas in Germany fortification still remains at a mean level of 20 mg/kg implying a growing risk of increasing iodine deficiency rates if general salt intake drops.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDietDiet SurveysFemaleGermanyHumansIodineMaleMiddle AgedSodium Chloride, DietarySwitzerlandYoung AdultIodineiodized saltSodium Chloride, DietaryComparison between Germany and SwitzerlandDEGS1IodineIodine-containing foodsIodized saltSalt

Identifiers

PMID31784815
OpenAlexW2989749820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.