ArticleScientific reports2019
Presynaptic dopamine function measured with [
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- L-DOPA administration shifts the stability-flexibility balance towards attentional capture by distractors during a visual search task.Psychopharmacology · 2022Trial
- The molecular footprint of the serotoninergic system in human glioblastoma cells.Journal of molecular histology · 2025Article
- Connection Failure: Differences in White Matter Microstructure Are Associated withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Value-based decision-making predicts alcohol use and related problems in young men.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2023Observational
- Article
- Pharmacological Modulation of Temporal Discounting: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Sensation-Seeking and Impulsivity in Athletes with Sport-Related Concussion.Current psychiatry reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We previously reported that L-DOPA effects on reward-based decision-making in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study were consistent with an inverted U-shaped function whereby both low and high extremes of dopamine signaling are associated with high-impulsive choice. To test this hypothesis, we performed [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.