ArticleScientific reports2019
Innovative particle standards and long-lived imaging for 2D and 3D dSTORM.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated Cyclic Super-Resolution Microscopy for Nanoscale Protein Mapping.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Using Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) with Photoactivated Localization Microscopy (PALM) to Analyze Hox/Cofactor Interactions at the Super Resolution Scale in Drosophila Salivary Glands.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Monitoring of single extracellular vesicle heterogeneity in cancer progression and therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Latest trends in bioimaging and building a proactive network of early-career young scientists around bioimaging in Europe.Biology open · 2022Article
- Comparative analysis of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2.S SARS-CoV-2 vector vaccines.Haematologica · 2022Article
- Superresolution Microscopy ofBio-protocol · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM), developed in the last decade, has revolutionised optical microscopy by enabling scientists to visualise objects beyond the resolution provided by conventional microscopy (200 nm). We developed an innovative method based on blinking particle standards and conditions for long-lived imaging over several weeks. Stable localisation precisions within the 10 nm-range were achieved for single virions and in cellulo 2D imaging of centrosomes, as well as their reliable reconstruction in 3D dSTORM.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.