ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2020
Trends, Outcomes, and Predictors of Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock.
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing the Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock After Myocardial Infarction in Women Across Different Age Groups.Cureus · 2025Article
- The current use of vasoactive agents in cardiogenic shock related to myocardial infarction and acute decompensated heart failure.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- Gut CommensalReviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Prolonged Impella 5.0/5.5 support within different pathways of care for cardiogenic shock: the experience of a referral center.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Investigating Weekend Effect in the Management of Upper and Lower Extremity Degloving Injuries.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Complications and Outcomes of Impella Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal life support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: surgical venting versus Impella device.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Fifteen-Year Trends in Incidence of Cardiogenic Shock Hospitalization and In-Hospital Mortality in the United States.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Trends of Clinical Outcomes and Health Care Resource Use in Heart Failure in the United States.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) carries high mortality and morbidity. Early revascularization is an important strategy in management of these patients. We sought to determine the outcomes and predictors of revascularization among patients with CS. Patients with CS and acute myocardial infarction were identified using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from January 2002 to December 2014 using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Subsequently, patients who underwent revascularization were then selected. A total of 118,618 patients with CS were identified. Out of these, about 55,735 (47%) patients underwent revascularization. Mean age of patients who underwent revascularization was lower when compared with patients not who underwent revascularization (66.40 vs 72.24 years, p < 0.01). Patients who underwent revascularization had lower mortality when compared with patients not who underwent revascularization (25.1% vs 52.2%, p < 0.01). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and mechanical circulatory support devices were often utilized more in patients who underwent revascularization. Overall, we found modest increased trend of revascularization over our study years with decline in mortality. Female gender, weekend admission, drug abuse, pulmonary hypertension, anemia, renal failure, neurological disorders, malignancy were associated with lower odds of revascularization. In conclusion, in this large nationally represented US population sample of CS patients, we found revascularization rate of about 47% with improvement in overall mortality over our study years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.