Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31783900›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial.

Marc Kowalkowski, Shih-Hsiung Chou, Andrew McWilliams, Cathryn Lashley, Stephanie Murphy, Whitney Rossman, Alfred Papali, Alan Heffner, Mark Russo, Larry Burke and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03865602 (Improving Morbidity During Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03865602 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Morbidity During Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): A Pragmatic Randomized Evaluation of Implementing Best Practice Care for Sepsis Survivors to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2019 to 2021Enrolled712ConditionsClinical SepsisArmsSepsis Transition And Recovery (STAR), Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marc KowalkowskiCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, 1540 Garden Terrace, Suite 308, Charlotte, NC, 28203, USA. Marc.Kowalkowski@AtriumHealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2624-4209
Shih-Hsiung ChouCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, 1540 Garden Terrace, Suite 308, Charlotte, NC, 28203, USA.
Andrew McWilliamsCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, 1540 Garden Terrace, Suite 308, Charlotte, NC, 28203, USA.
Cathryn LashleyAmbulatory Care Management, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Stephanie MurphyTransition Services, Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Whitney RossmanCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, 1540 Garden Terrace, Suite 308, Charlotte, NC, 28203, USA.
Alfred PapaliDivision of Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Alan HeffnerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Mark RussoDivision of Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Larry BurkeDivision of Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Michael GibbsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Stephanie P TaylorDepartment of Internal Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Atrium Health ACORN Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital mortality for patients with sepsis has recently declined, but sepsis survivors still suffer from significant long-term mortality and morbidity. There are limited data that support effective strategies to address post-discharge management of patients hospitalized with sepsis.

methodsThe Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS) study is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial at three hospitals within a single healthcare delivery system comparing clinical outcomes between sepsis survivors who receive usual care versus care delivered through the Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program. The STAR program includes a centrally located nurse navigator using telephone counseling and electronic health record-based support to facilitate best-practice post-sepsis care strategies for patients during hospitalization and the 30 days after hospital discharge, including post-discharge review of medications, evaluation for new impairments or symptoms, monitoring existing comorbidities, and palliative care referral when appropriate. Adults admitted through the Emergency Department with suspected infection (i.e., antibiotics initiated, bacterial cultures drawn) and deemed, by previously developed risk-stratification models, high risk for readmission or death are included. Eligible patients are randomly allocated 1:1 to either Arm 1, usual care or Arm 2, STAR. Planned enrollment is 708 patients during a 6-month period. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause hospital readmissions and mortality assessed 30 days post discharge. Secondary outcomes include 30- and 90-day hospital readmissions, mortality, emergency department visits, acute care-free days alive, and acute care and total costs. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic evaluation provides the most comprehensive assessment to date of a strategy to improve delivery of recommended post-sepsis care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03865602. Registered retrospectively on 6 March 2019.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareSepsisAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMorbidityPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicContinuity of patient careHealth servicesInfectionPatient navigatorPragmatic clinical trialSepsis

Identifiers

PMID31783900
PMCPMC6884908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.