ArticleTrials2019
Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03865602 (Improving Morbidity During Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Morbidity During Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): A Pragmatic Randomized Evaluation of Implementing Best Practice Care for Sepsis Survivors to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of targeted post-acute interventions and follow-up services for sepsis survivors: a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Community care navigation intervention for people who are at risk of unplanned hospital presentations.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Characterizing Program Delivery for an Effective Multicomponent Sepsis Recovery Intervention.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Trial
- Predictors of functional outcome at 3 months in ischemic stroke patients with discharge disability following endovascular therapy: a multi-center observational cohort study of 836 patients.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Observational
- Intensive care patients eligible for intermediate care unit-level care: a single-centre prospective cohort study in Belgium.Critical care science · 2026Article
- Integrating Telehealth into Community-Based Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Emergency Surgery, Multimorbidity and Hospital-Free Days: A Retrospective Observational Study.The Journal of surgical research · 2023Observational
- Practical value of predictive nursing in the operating room for stress reaction and risk events in elderly patients with lower limb fractures.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Recommendations for the Design and Delivery of Transitions-Focused Digital Health Interventions: Rapid Review.JMIR aging · 2022Review
- Deficits in Identification of Goals and Goal-Concordant Care After Sepsis Hospitalization.Journal of hospital medicine · 2021Article
- Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.Intensive care medicine · 2021Article
- Hospital-Free Days: A Pragmatic and Patient-centered Outcome for Trials among Critically and Seriously Ill Patients.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021Article
- Protocol for a two-arm pragmatic stepped-wedge hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial evaluating Engagement and Collaborative Management to Proactively Advance Sepsis Survivorship (ENCOMPASS).BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Translating Postsepsis Care to Post-COVID-19 Care. The Case for a Virtual Recovery Program.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2021Article
- Risk of Adverse Clinical Outcomes in Hyponatremic Adult Patients Hospitalized for Acute Medical Conditions: A Population-Based Cohort Study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital mortality for patients with sepsis has recently declined, but sepsis survivors still suffer from significant long-term mortality and morbidity. There are limited data that support effective strategies to address post-discharge management of patients hospitalized with sepsis.
methodsThe Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS) study is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial at three hospitals within a single healthcare delivery system comparing clinical outcomes between sepsis survivors who receive usual care versus care delivered through the Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program. The STAR program includes a centrally located nurse navigator using telephone counseling and electronic health record-based support to facilitate best-practice post-sepsis care strategies for patients during hospitalization and the 30 days after hospital discharge, including post-discharge review of medications, evaluation for new impairments or symptoms, monitoring existing comorbidities, and palliative care referral when appropriate. Adults admitted through the Emergency Department with suspected infection (i.e., antibiotics initiated, bacterial cultures drawn) and deemed, by previously developed risk-stratification models, high risk for readmission or death are included. Eligible patients are randomly allocated 1:1 to either Arm 1, usual care or Arm 2, STAR. Planned enrollment is 708 patients during a 6-month period. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause hospital readmissions and mortality assessed 30 days post discharge. Secondary outcomes include 30- and 90-day hospital readmissions, mortality, emergency department visits, acute care-free days alive, and acute care and total costs. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic evaluation provides the most comprehensive assessment to date of a strategy to improve delivery of recommended post-sepsis care.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03865602. Registered retrospectively on 6 March 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.