ArticleBMC health services research2019
Dementia assessment and management in primary care settings: a survey of current provider practices in the United States.
Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06565169 (Improving Primary Care Clinician's Advance Care Planning Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias), which is not on this map. Cited by 80 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Primary Care Clinician's Advance Care Planning Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Transformer-Based Deep Learning Approaches for Speech-Based Dementia Detection: A Systematic Review.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2026Pooled it
- Alzheimer's Association clinical practice guideline for the Diagnostic Evaluation, Testing, Counseling, and Disclosure of Suspected Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (DETeCD-ADRD): Executive summary of recommendations for primary care.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Guideline
- Barriers for access and utilization of dementia care services in Europe: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Palliative Care in Early Dementia.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2024Pooled it
- Understanding barriers to and facilitators of clinician-patient conversations about brain health and cognitive concerns in primary care: a systematic review and practical considerations for the clinician.BMC primary care · 2023Pooled it
- Current State of Self-Administered Brief Computerized Cognitive Assessments for Detection of Cognitive Disorders in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's diseasePooled it
- Advancing dementia preparedness in Low and Middle Income countries: A randomized trial to improve diagnosis in primary care.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Trial
- Examining the Decision to Take a Dementia Risk Test: Considerations for Privacy in Screening At-Home.Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders · 2026Article
- Documented follow-up to memory concerns reported at the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Trends in the Incidence of Early- and Late-Onset Dementia in 2011-2019: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders · 2026Article
- A deep joint-learning proteomics model for diagnosis of six conditions associated with dementia.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of MyCog Mobile: development of a parsimonious and clinically interpretable prediction model for mild cognitive impairment.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- A rapid educational intervention to enhance brain MRI interpretation skills of radiology professionals for dementia diagnosis in Uganda: a pre- and post-intervention study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Review of Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Use in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.Seminars in neurology · 2026Review
- Navigating Alzheimer's Disease in Primary Care: Practical Strategies for Diagnosis and Management.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Acceptable standards for clinic-based digital cognitive assessments: Recommendations from the Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer's Disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- The National Dementia Workforce Study: Overview.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- The National Dementia Workforce Study: Perspective From the National Institute on Aging.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- The National Dementia Workforce Study: Methods for Surveying Community Clinicians Who Provide Care to People With Dementia.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Design and protocol of a pragmatic clinical trial to improve cognitive impairment detection in primary care.Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Article
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care providers (PCPs) are typically the first to screen and evaluate patients for neurocognitive disorders (NCDs), including mild cognitive impairment and dementia. However, data on PCP attitudes and evaluation and management practices are sparse. Our objective was to quantify perspectives and behaviors of PCPs and neurologists with respect to NCD evaluation and management.
methodsA cross-sectional survey with 150 PCPs and 50 neurologists in the United States who evaluated more than 10 patients over age 55 per month. The 51-item survey assessed clinical practice characteristics, and confidence, perceived barriers, and typical practices when diagnosing and managing patients with NCDs.
resultsPCPs and neurologists reported similar confidence and approaches to general medical care and laboratory testing. Though over half of PCPs performed cognitive screening or referred patients for cognitive testing in over 50% of their patients, only 20% reported high confidence in interpreting results of cognitive tests. PCPs were more likely to order CT scans than MRIs, and only 14% of PCPs reported high confidence interpreting brain imaging findings, compared to 70% of specialists. Only 21% of PCPs were highly confident that they correctly recognized when a patient had an NCD, and only 13% were highly confident in making a specific NCD diagnosis (compared to 72 and 44% for neurologists, both p < 0.001). A quarter of all providers identified lack of familiarity with diagnostic criteria for NCD syndromes as a barrier to clinical practice.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates how PCPs approach diagnosis and management of patients with NCDs, and identified areas for improvement in regards to cognitive testing and neuroimaging. This study also identified all providers' lack of familiarity with published diagnostic criteria for NCD syndromes. These findings may inform the development of new policies and interventions to help providers improve the efficacy of their decision processes and deliver better quality care to patients with NCDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.