Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31783818›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

Topoisomerase I activity and sensitivity to camptothecin in breast cancer-derived cells: a comparative study.

Cinzia Tesauro, Anne Katrine Simonsen, Marie Bech Andersen, Kamilla Wandsoe Petersen, Emil Laust Kristoffersen, Line Algreen, Noriko Yokoyama Hansen, Anne Bech Andersen, Ann Katrine Jakobsen, Magnus Stougaard and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Targeting Breast Cancer: An Overlook on Current Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Cinzia TesauroDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anne Katrine SimonsenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Marie Bech AndersenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kamilla Wandsoe PetersenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Emil Laust KristoffersenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Line AlgreenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Noriko Yokoyama HansenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anne Bech AndersenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ann Katrine JakobsenDepartment of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Magnus StougaardDepartment of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Pavel GromovGenome Integrity Unit, Breast Cancer Biology Group, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Birgitta R KnudsenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. brk@mbg.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3484-3802
Irina GromovaGenome Integrity Unit, Breast Cancer Biology Group, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark. iig@cancer.dk.
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKDanish Cancer Society · DKMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Danish National Research Foundation CARD, DNRF125The Eurocan Platform 260791
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCamptothecin (CPT) and its derivatives are currently used as second- or third-line treatment for patients with endocrine-resistant breast cancer (BC). These drugs convert nuclear enzyme DNA topoisomerase I (TOP1) to a cell poison with the potential to damage DNA by increasing the half-life of TOP1-DNA cleavage complexes (TOP1cc), ultimately resulting in cell death. In small and non-randomized trials for BC, researchers have observed extensive variation in CPT response rates, ranging from 14 to 64%. This variability may be due to the absence of reliable selective parameters for patient stratification. BC cell lines may serve as feasible models for generation of functional criteria that may be used to predict drug sensitivity for patient stratification and, thus, lead to more appropriate applications of CPT in clinical trials. However, no study published to date has included a comparison of multiple relevant parameters and CPT response across cell lines corresponding to specific BC subtypes.

methodWe evaluated the levels and possible associations of seven parameters including the status of the TOP1 gene (i.e. amplification), TOP1 protein expression level, TOP1 activity and CPT susceptibility, activity of the tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1), the cellular CPT response and the cellular growth rate across a representative panel of BC cell lines, which exemplifies three major BC subtypes: Luminal, HER2 and TNBC.

resultsIn all BC cell lines analyzed (without regard to subtype classification), we observed a significant overall correlation between growth rate and CPT response. In cell lines derived from Luminal and HER2 subtypes, we observed a correlation between TOP1 gene copy number, TOP1 activity, and CPT response, although the data were too limited for statistical analyses. In cell lines representing Luminal and TNBC subtypes, we observed a direct correlation between TOP1 protein abundancy and levels of enzymatic activity. In all three subtypes (Luminal, HER2, and TNBC), TOP1 exhibits approximately the same susceptibility to CPT. Of the three subtypes examined, the TNBC-like cell lines exhibited the highest CPT sensitivity and were characterized by the fastest growth rate. This indicates that breast tumors belonging to the TNBC subtype, may benefit from treatment with CPT derivatives.

conclusionTOP1 activity is not a marker for CPT sensitivity in breast cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBreast NeoplasmsCamptothecinCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDNA Topoisomerases, Type IDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGene DosageGene ExpressionHumansPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesTopoisomerase I InhibitorsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinDNA Topoisomerases, Type IPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesTDP1 protein, humanTOP1 protein, humanTopoisomerase I InhibitorsBreast cancerBreast cancer cell linesBreast tumor subtypesCamptothecin sensivityTopoisomerase I

Identifiers

PMID31783818
PMCPMC6884793
OpenAlexW2991178459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.