Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31783780›Full record

ArticleHuman genomics2019

Noninvasive prenatal testing for chromosome aneuploidies and subchromosomal microdeletions/microduplications in a cohort of 42,910 single pregnancies with different clinical features.

Yibo Chen, Qi Yu, Xiongying Mao, Wei Lei, Miaonan He, Wenbo Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
27.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Single-cell-based non-invasive screening for fetal pathogenic microimbalances using maternal blood: comparison with invasive prenatal diagnosis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yibo ChenNingbo Women and Children Hospital, No.339, Liuting Street, Haishu District Ningbo, Ningbo, 315010, China.
Qi YuNingbo Women and Children Hospital, No.339, Liuting Street, Haishu District Ningbo, Ningbo, 315010, China.
Xiongying MaoNingbo Women and Children Hospital, No.339, Liuting Street, Haishu District Ningbo, Ningbo, 315010, China.
Wei LeiCapitalBio Technology Inc., Beijing, 101111, China.
Miaonan HeBeijing CapitalBio Medical Laboratory, Beijing, 101111, China.
Wenbo LuNingbo Women and Children Hospital, No.339, Liuting Street, Haishu District Ningbo, Ningbo, 315010, China. 13957874007@163.com.
Beijing VDJBio (China) · CN

Funding

Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan Project No. 2018KY720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the discovery of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma, it has opened up new approaches for non-invasive prenatal testing. With the development of whole-genome sequencing, small subchromosomal deletions and duplications could be found by NIPT. This study is to review the efficacy of NIPT as a screening test for aneuploidies and CNVs in 42,910 single pregnancies.

methodsA total of 42,910 single pregnancies with different clinical features were recruited. The cell-free fetal DNA was directly sequenced. Each of the chromosome aneuploidies and the subchromosomal microdeletions/microduplications of PPV were analyzed.

resultsA total of 534 pregnancies (1.24%) were abnormal results detected by NIPT, and 403 pregnancies had underwent prenatal diagnosis. The positive predictive value (PPV) for trisomy 21(T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs), and other chromosome aneuploidy was 79.23%, 54.84%, 13.79%, 33.04%, and 9.38% respectively. The PPV for CNVs was 28.99%. The PPV for CNVs ≤ 5 Mb is 20.83%, for within 5-10 Mb 50.00%, for > 10 Mb 27.27% respectively. PPVs of NIPT according to pregnancies characteristics are also different.

conclusionOur data have potential significance in demonstrating the usefulness of NIPT profiling not only for common whole chromosome aneuploidies but also for CNVs. However, this newest method is still in its infancy for CNVs. There is still a need for clinical validation studies with accurate detection rates and false positive rates in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AneuploidyChromosome DeletionNoninvasive Prenatal TestingAdolescentAdultChromosome DuplicationCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyYoung AdultChromosome aneuploidiesClinical featuresMicrodeletion/microduplication syndromes (MMS)Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT)Positive predictive value (PPV)

Identifiers

PMID31783780
PMCPMC6884830
OpenAlexW2990650357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.