Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31783636›Full record

ReviewNutrients2019

Nutritional Gaps and Supplementation in the First 1000 Days.

Katrina Beluska-Turkan, Renee Korczak, Beth Hartell, Kristin Moskal, Johanna Maukonen, Diane E Alexander, Norman Salem, Laura Harkness, Wafaa Ayad, Jacalyn Szaro and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katrina Beluska-TurkanChurch & Dwight, Co., Inc., Product Development Nutritional Sciences, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Renee KorczakPremier Nutrition, LLC, Bernardsville, NJ 07924, USA.
Beth HartellPearTree Nutrition, LLC, Seattle, WA 98115, USA.
Kristin MoskalChurch & Dwight, Co., Inc., Product Development Nutritional Sciences, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Johanna MaukonenDupont Nutrition & Biosciences, FIN-02460 Kantvik, Finland.
Diane E AlexanderKemin Industries, Inc., Des Moines, IA 50317, USA.
Norman SalemDSM Nutritional Products, Columbia, MD 21045, USA.
Laura HarknessChurch & Dwight, Co., Inc., Product Development Nutritional Sciences, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Wafaa AyadChurch & Dwight, Co., Inc., Product Development Nutritional Sciences, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Jacalyn SzaroChurch & Dwight, Co., Inc., Product Development Nutritional Sciences, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Kelly ZhangChurch & Dwight, Co., Inc., Product Development Nutritional Sciences, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Nalin SiriwardhanaChurch & Dwight, Co., Inc., Product Development Nutritional Sciences, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Church & Dwight (United States) · USNutrition 21 (United States) · USDuPont (Finland) · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimized nutrition during the first 1000 days (from conception through the 2nd birthday) is critical for healthy development and a healthy life for the newborn. Pregnancy and the postpartum period are accompanied by physiological changes, increased energy needs, and changing requirements in the nutrients critical for optimal growth and development. Infants and toddlers also experience physiological changes and have specific nutritional needs. Food and nutrition experts can provide women of childbearing age with adequate dietary advice to optimize nutrition, as well as guidance on selecting appropriate dietary supplements. Considering the approaching 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) will be making specific recommendations for children, it is important to provide accurate scientific information to support health influencers in the field of nutrition. The purpose of this review is to summarize the nutrition and supplementation literature for the first 1000 days; to highlight nutritional and knowledge gaps; and to educate nutrition influencers to provide thoughtful guidance to mothers and families. Optimal nutrition during pregnancy through early childhood is critical for supporting a healthy life. Nutrition influencers, such as dietitians, obstetricians/gynecologists, and other relevant health professionals, should continue guiding supplement and food intake and work closely with expectant families and nutrition gatekeepers.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsNutritional RequirementsChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutrition PolicyPregnancyPrenatal Caredeficiencyearly childhoodfirst 1000 dayslife cyclenutritionpregnancysupplementation

Identifiers

PMID31783636
PMCPMC6949907
OpenAlexW2990080039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.