Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31783551›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Validation of a Novel Device for the Knee Monitoring of Orthopaedic Patients.

Mahmut Enes Kayaalp, Alison N Agres, Jan Reichmann, Maxim Bashkuev, Georg N Duda, Roland Becker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahmut Enes KayaalpDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, 14770 Brandenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9545-7454
Alison N AgresJulius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Jan ReichmannStatConsult GmbH, 39112 Magdeburg, Germany.
Maxim BashkuevJulius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Georg N DudaJulius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Roland BeckerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, 14770 Brandenburg, Germany.
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEInfoConsult (Germany) · DEIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie 16KN055821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast-track surgery is becoming increasingly popular, whereas the monitoring of postoperative rehabilitation remains a matter of considerable debate. The aim of this study was to validate a newly developed wearable system intended to monitor knee function and mobility. A sensor system with a nine-degree-of-freedom (DOF) inertial measurement unit (IMU) was developed. Thirteen healthy volunteers performed five 10-meter walking trials with simultaneous sensor and motion capture data collection. The obtained kinematic waveforms were analysed using root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (CC) calculations. The Bland-Altman method was used for the agreement of discrete parameters consisting of peak knee angles between systems. To test the reliability, 10 other subjects with sensors walked a track of 10 metres on two consecutive days. The Pearson CC was excellent for the walking data set between both systems (r = 0.96) and very good (r = 0.95) within the sensor system. The RMSE during walking was 5.17° between systems and 6.82° within sensor measurements. No significant differences were detected between the mean values observed, except for the extension angle during the stance phase (E1). Similar results were obtained for the repeatability test. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) between systems were excellent for the flexion angle during the swing phase (F1); good for the flexion angle during the stance phase (F2) and the re-extension angle, which was calculated by subtracting the extension angle at swing phase (E2) from F2; and moderate for the extension angle during the stance phase (E1), E2 and the range of motion (ROM). ICCs within the sensor measurements were good for the ROM, F2 and re-extension, and moderate for F1, E1 and E2. The study shows that the novel sensor system can record sagittal knee kinematics during walking in healthy subjects comparable to those of a motion capture system.

Indexed as

Monitoring, PhysiologicWearable Electronic DevicesAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleGaitHealthy VolunteersHumansKnee JointMaleOrthopedicsRange of Motion, ArticularTelemedicineWalkingfast-track surgeryinertial sensorsknee activity monitorremote monitoringTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31783551
PMCPMC6928629
OpenAlexW2990625277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.