ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2020
Modified lymph node ratio improves the prognostic predictive ability for breast cancer patients compared with other lymph node staging systems.
Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of metastatic lymph-node ratio and log-odds of positive nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- A Prognostic Model Based on the Log Odds Ratio of Positive Lymph Nodes Predicts Prognosis of Patients with Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Article
- Review
- Prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis using tumor volume to breast volume ratio: retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Article
- Analysis of factors associated with the prognosis of papillary thyroid cancer and the construction of a survival model.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Association of high miR-27a, miR-206, and miR-214 expression with poor patient prognosis and increased chemoresistance in triple-negative breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Predictive Factors for Unnecessary Axillary Dissection According to SLN Metastasis in T1, T2 Stage Breast Cancer.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Potential prognostic value of the lymph node ratio and its correlation with circulating sex hormone concentration in pathological T1/2 breast cancer patients: a retrospective study.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Beyond N staging in colorectal cancer: Current approaches and future perspectives.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Article
- The role of different lymph node staging systems in predicting prognosis and determining indications for postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with T1-T2pN1 breast carcinoma.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020Article
- Nomogram prediction of overall survival based on log odds of positive lymph nodes for patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetastatic regional lymph nodes (LN) is a strong predictor of worse long-term outcome. Therefore, different LN staging systems have been proposed in recent years. In this study, we proposed a modified lymph node ratio (mLNR) as a new lymph node staging system and then compared the prognostic performance of mLNR with American Joint Committee on Cancer N stage, lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.
methodsBreast cancer patients who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2012 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Restricted cubic spline functions were calculated to characterize the association between variables and the risk of death. The Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess the predictive ability of different lymph node staging systems using the Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) and Harrell's concordance index (C-index).
resultsA total of 264,096 breast cancer patients were enrolled and 187,785 (71.1%) patients had a limited number of LNs harvested. In the limited LN harvest cohort, the prognostic performance of LNR decreased and mLNR could greatly solve this problem. In addition, among the entire cohort, mLNR modeled as a continuous value had the best predictive ability (AIC: 922021.9 and C-index: 0.727) than other lymph node staging systems.
conclusionsThe predictive ability of LNR is restricted by a limited LN harvest. However, mLNR shows superiority to LNR and other lymph node staging systems especially in a limited LN harvest cohort, making mLNR the most powerful lymph node staging systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.