ArticleNeuroImage2020
Comparing functional connectivity matrices: A geometry-aware approach applied to participant identification.
Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Cerebellar Connectome.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- CA1 Engram Cell Dynamics Before and After Learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- STFusion: A Spatial-Temporal Dual-Pathway Network with Multi-scale Attention Fusion for Early Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- Representational differentiation and integration within the hippocampal circuit during naturalistic stimuli.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Divergence unveils further distinct phenotypic traits of human brain connectomics fingerprint.iScience · 2026Article
- Connectome caricatures remove large-amplitude coactivation patterns in resting-state fMRI to emphasize individual differences.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- Salience network segregation and symptom profiles in psychosis risk subgroups among youth and early adults.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Introduction to correlation networks: Interdisciplinary approaches beyond thresholding.Physics reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Pioneering new paths: the role of generative modelling in neurological disease research.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025Review
- VTA projections to M1 are essential for reorganization of layer 2-3 network dynamics underlying motor learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Efficacy of functional connectome fingerprinting using tangent-space brain networks.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Improved whole-brain reconfiguration efficiency reveals mechanisms of speech rehabilitation in cleft lip and palate patients: an fMRI study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Tangent space functional reconfigurations in individuals at risk for alcohol use disorder.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Structured noise champagne: an empirical Bayesian algorithm for electromagnetic brain imaging with structured noise.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Deep learning models reveal the link between dynamic brain connectivity patterns and states of consciousness.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Separating group- and individual-level brain signatures in the newborn functional connectome: A deep learning approach.NeuroImage · 2024Article
- Article
- Extracting interpretable signatures of whole-brain dynamics through systematic comparison.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the correlation structure associated with multiple brain measurements informs about potential "functional groupings" and network organization. The correlation structure can be conveniently captured in a matrix format that summarizes the relationships among a set of brain measurements involving two regions, for example. Such functional connectivity matrix is an important component of many types of investigation focusing on network-level properties of the brain, including clustering brain states, characterizing dynamic functional states, performing participant identification (so-called "fingerprinting") understanding how tasks reconfigure brain networks, and inter-subject correlation analysis. In these investigations, some notion of proximity or similarity of functional connectivity matrices is employed, such as their Euclidean distance or Pearson correlation (by correlating the matrix entries). Here, we propose the use of a geodesic distance metric that reflects the underlying non-Euclidean geometry of functional correlation matrices. The approach is evaluated in the context of participant identification (fingerprinting): given a participant's functional connectivity matrix based on resting-state or task data, how effectively can the participant be identified? Using geodesic distance, identification accuracy was over 95% on resting-state data, and exceeded the Pearson correlation approach by 20%. For whole-cortex regions, accuracy improved on a range of tasks by between 2% and as much as 20%. We also investigated identification using pairs of subnetworks (say, dorsal attention plus default mode), and particular combinations improved accuracy over whole-cortex participant identification by over 10%. The geodesic distance also outperformed Pearson correlation when the former employed a fourth of the data as the latter. Finally, we suggest that low-dimensional distance visualizations based on the geodesic approach help uncover the geometry of task functional connectivity in relation to that during resting-state. We propose that the use of the geodesic distance is an effective way to compare the correlation structure of the brain across a broad range of studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.