Observational studyAmerican journal of ophthalmology2020
Punctiform and Polychromatic Pre-Descemet Corneal Dystrophy: Clinical Evaluation and Identification of the Genetic Basis.
Observational study in American journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Corneal dystrophies.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study reports the clinical features and genetic bases of 3 previously unreported families with punctiform and polychromatic pre-Descemet corneal dystrophy (PPPCD).
designObservational case series.
methodsFull ophthalmic assessment was performed for members of 3 unreported families with PPPCD. Structural and biomechanical alterations of the cornea were screened. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed in the first family. Novel or rare variants that segregated with the affected status were screened in the other 2 families using Sanger sequencing. Identified variants that segregated with the affected status in all families were characterized by using in silico prediction tools and/or in vitro splice assays. Additionally, 2 previously reported PPPCD families were screened for variants identified in the 3 unreported PPPCD families.
resultsPPPCD was diagnosed in 12 of the 21 examined members of the 3 unreported families. The only refractive, topographic, or biomechanical abnormality associated with PPPCD was a significantly increased corneal stiffness. WES and Sanger sequencing identified 2 variants that segregated with the affected status in all 3 families: a rare intronic PDZD8 c.872+10A>T variant and a novel missense PRDX3 c.568G>C (p.Asp190His) variant. The same PRDX3 variant was identified in the previously reported PPPCD family expressing the common PPPCD phenotype and was predicted by in silico prediction tools to be damaging to protein function.
conclusionsPPPCD is associated with an alteration of corneal biomechanics and a novel missense variant in PRDX3. Screening of additional families will determine whether all families demonstrate a PRDX3 variant or whether locus heterogeneity may exist for PPPCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.