Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31782966›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2020

A randomized clinical trial of mobile phone motivational interviewing for alcohol use problems in Kenya.

Valerie S Harder, Abednego M Musau, Christine W Musyimi, David M Ndetei, Victoria N Mutiso

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Psychosocial Interventions for Alcohol Use Disorder: A Review of Efficacy, Mechanisms, and Clinical Implications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Motivational interviewing for substance use among adults in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valerie S HarderDepartments of Pediatrics and Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2869-2443
Abednego M MusauAfrica Mental Health Foundation, Nairobi, Kenya.
Christine W MusyimiAfrica Mental Health Foundation, Nairobi, Kenya.
David M NdeteiAfrica Mental Health Foundation, Nairobi, Kenya.
Victoria N MutisoAfrica Mental Health Foundation, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

Mobile Substance Use Intervention for HIV PreventionR21TW009786 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HARDER, VALERIE S · 2013 to 2015
$276k
AHRQ HHS R03 HS024575FIC NIH HHS R21 TW009786NIH HHS R21TW009786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo test the effectiveness of a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention using the mobile phone among adults with alcohol use problems.

designA randomized clinical trial of mobile MI and standard in-person MI with 1- and 6-month follow-up, including a 1-month waitlist control followed by mobile MI.

settingA primary health center in rural Kenya.

participantsThree hundred adults screening positive for alcohol use problems were randomized and received immediate mobile MI (n = 89), in-person MI (n = 65) or delayed mobile MI (n = 76) for waiting-list controls 1 month after no treatment, with 70 unable to be reached for intervention. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: One MI session was provided either immediately by mobile phone, in-person at the health center or delayed by 1 month and then provided by mobile phone. MEASUREMENTS: Alcohol use problems were repeatedly assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) and the shorter AUDIT-C. The primary outcome was difference in alcohol score 1 month after no intervention for waiting-list control versus 1 month after MI for mobile MI. The secondary outcomes were difference in alcohol score for in-person MI versus mobile MI one and 6 months after MI.

findingsFor our primary outcome, average AUDIT-C scores were nearly three points higher (difference = 2.88, 95% confidence interval = 2.11, 3.66) for waiting-list controls after 1 month of no intervention versus mobile MI 1 month after intervention. Results for secondary outcomes supported the null hypothesis of no difference between in-person and mobile MI at 1 month (Bayes factor = 0.22), but were inconclusive at 6 months (Bayes factor = 0.41).

conclusionMobile phone-based motivational interviewing may be an effective treatment for alcohol use problems among adults visiting primary care in Kenya. Providing mobile motivational interviewing may help clinicians in rural areas to reach patients needing treatment for alcohol use problems.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneMotivational InterviewingAdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcohol-Related DisordersBayes TheoremFemaleHumansKenyaMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareTreatment OutcomeAlcohol use disordersHIV/AIDSKenyamHealthmobile interventionmotivational interviewing

Identifiers

PMID31782966
PMCPMC8353663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.