Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31782694›Full record

ReviewCBE life sciences education2019

Models and Impacts of Science Research Experiences: A Review of the Literature of CUREs, UREs, and TREs.

Jessica S Krim, Laleh E Coté, Renée S Schwartz, Elisa M Stone, Jessica J Cleeves, Kelly J Barry, Wilella Burgess, Sanlyn R Buxner, Jordan M Gerton, Lawrence Horvath and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CBE life sciences education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A CURE on the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance inCBE life sciences education · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jessica S KrimCurriculum and Instruction, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL 62026.
Laleh E CotéWorkforce Development & Education, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Renée S SchwartzScience Education, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30306.
Elisa M StoneCalTeach, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Jessica J CleevesCenter for Science and Mathematics Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Kelly J BarryBiological Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL 62026.
Wilella Burgess**Evaluation and Research Learning Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Sanlyn R BuxnerTeaching/Learning and Sociocultural Studies, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
Jordan M GertonCenter for Science and Mathematics Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Lawrence HorvathSecondary Education and Center for Science and Math Education, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132.
John M KellerFiske Planetarium, Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309.
Soon Chun LeeSTEM Education, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260.
Sharon M LockeEnvironmental Sciences and STEM Center for Research, Education, and Outreach, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL 62026.
Bryan M RebarSTEM CORE, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Careers through Outreach, Research, & Education, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In efforts to increase scientific literacy and enhance the preparation of learners to pursue careers in science, there are growing opportunities for students and teachers to engage in scientific research experiences, including course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), undergraduate research experiences (UREs), and teacher research experiences (TREs). Prior literature reviews detail a variety of models, benefits, and challenges and call for the continued examination of program elements and associated impacts. This paper reports a comprehensive review of 307 papers published between 2007 and 2017 that include CURE, URE, and TRE programs, with a special focus on research experiences for K-12 teachers. A research-supported conceptual model of science research experiences was used to develop a coding scheme, including participant demographics, theoretical frameworks, methodology, and reported outcomes. We summarize recent reports on program impacts and identify gaps or misalignments between goals and measured outcomes. The field of biology was the predominant scientific disciplinary focus. Findings suggest a lack of studies explicitly targeting 1) participation and outcomes related to learners from underrepresented populations, 2) a theoretical framework that guides program design and analysis, and, for TREs, 3) methods for translation of research experiences into K-12 instructional practices, and 4) measurement of impact on K-12 instructional practices.

Indexed as

CurriculumFacultyModels, EducationalResearchUniversitiesAuthorshipHumansScience

Identifiers

PMID31782694
PMCPMC6889846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.