Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31782377›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of nutrition2019

Reproductive state and choline intake influence enrichment of plasma lysophosphatidylcholine-DHA: a

Kevin C Klatt, Melissa Q McDougall, Olga V Malysheva, J Thomas Brenna, Mark S Roberson, Marie A Caudill

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Choline metabolome response to prenatal choline supplementation across pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin C KlattDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Melissa Q McDougallDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Olga V MalyshevaDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
J Thomas BrennaDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Mark S RobersonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Marie A CaudillDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Cornell University · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

TRAINING IN MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITIONT32HD087137 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Laura Bellows, Julia L. Finkelstein · 2016 to 2026
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD087137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The major facilitator superfamily domain 2a protein was identified recently as a lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) symporter with high affinity for LPC species enriched with DHA (LPC-DHA). To test the hypothesis that reproductive state and choline intake influence plasma LPC-DHA, we performed a post hoc analysis of samples available through 10 weeks of a previously conducted feeding study, which provided two doses of choline (480 and 930 mg/d) to non-pregnant (n 21), third-trimester pregnant (n 26), and lactating (n 24) women; all participants consumed 200 mg of supplemental DHA and 22 % of their daily choline intake as 2H-labelled choline. The effects of reproductive state and choline intake on total LPC-DHA (expressed as a percentage of LPC) and plasma enrichments of labelled LPC and LPC-DHA were assessed using mixed and generalised linear models. Reproductive state interacted with time (P = 0·001) to influence total LPC-DHA, which significantly increased by week 10 in non-pregnant women, but not in pregnant or lactating women. Contrary to total LPC-DHA, patterns of labelled LPC-DHA enrichments were discordant between pregnant and lactating women (P < 0·05), suggestive of unique, reproductive state-specific mechanisms that result in reduced production and/or enhanced clearance of LPC-DHA during pregnancy and lactation. Regardless of the reproductive state, women consuming 930 v. 480 mg choline per d exhibited no change in total LPC-DHA but higher d3-LPC-DHA (P = 0·02), indicating that higher choline intakes favour the production of LPC-DHA from the phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase pathway of phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis. Our results warrant further investigation into the effect of reproductive state and dietary choline on LPC-DHA dynamics and its contribution to DHA status.

Indexed as

AdultCholineDeuteriumDietary SupplementsDocosahexaenoic AcidsFemaleGenotypeHumansLactationPhosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylethanolamine N-MethyltransferasePregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdReproductionCholineDeuteriumDocosahexaenoic AcidsPhosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylethanolamine N-MethyltransferaseDHADietary cholineLactationLysophosphatidylcholinePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31782377
PMCPMC10864093
OpenAlexW2968903493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.