Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31782166›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2020

Imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib: From flat-fixed dosing towards a pharmacokinetically guided personalized dose.

Kim Westerdijk, Ingrid M E Desar, Neeltje Steeghs, Winette T A van der Graaf, Nielka P van Erp, Dutch Pharmacology and Oncology Group (DPOG)

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Novel Approaches to Characterize Individual Drug Metabolism and Advance Precision Medicine.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kim WesterdijkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3512-4671
Ingrid M E DesarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Neeltje SteeghsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Winette T A van der GraafDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Nielka P van ErpDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1553-178X
Dutch Pharmacology and Oncology Group (DPOG)
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are anti-cancer drugs that target tyrosine kinases, enzymes that are involved in multiple cellular processes. Currently, multiple oral TKIs have been introduced in the treatment of solid tumours, all administered in a fixed dose, although large interpatient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability is described. For imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib exposure-treatment outcome (efficacy and toxicity) relationships have been established and therapeutic windows have been defined, therefore dose optimization based on the measured blood concentration, called therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), can be valuable in increasing efficacy and reducing the toxicity of these drugs. In this review, an overview of the current knowledge on TDM guided individualized dosing of imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib for the treatment of solid tumours is presented. We summarize preclinical and clinical data that have defined thresholds for efficacy and toxicity. Furthermore, PK models and factors that influence the PK of these drugs which partly explain the interpatient PK variability are summarized. Finally, pharmacological interventions that have been performed to optimize plasma concentrations are described. Based on current literature, we advise which methods should be used to optimize exposure to imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsPyrimidinesDrug MonitoringHumansImatinib MesylateIndazolesProtein Kinase InhibitorsSulfonamidesSunitinibAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateIndazolespazopanibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesSulfonamidesSunitinibanticancer drugspharmacodynamicspharmacokineticstherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID31782166
PMCPMC7015742
OpenAlexW2991525471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.