Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31782049›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2020

The Diagnostic Utility of VibraTip for Distal Symmetrical Polyneuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Nikolaos Papanas, Kalliopi Pafili, Maria Demetriou, Stella Papachristou, Soultana Kyroglou, Dimitrios Papazoglou, Efstratios Maltezos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikolaos PapanasDiabetes Centre-Diabetic Foot Clinic, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece. papanasnikos@yahoo.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7320-785X
Kalliopi PafiliDiabetes Centre-Diabetic Foot Clinic, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Maria DemetriouDiabetes Centre-Diabetic Foot Clinic, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Stella PapachristouDiabetes Centre-Diabetic Foot Clinic, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Soultana KyroglouDiabetes Centre-Diabetic Foot Clinic, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Dimitrios PapazoglouDiabetes Centre-Diabetic Foot Clinic, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Efstratios MaltezosDiabetes Centre-Diabetic Foot Clinic, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Democritus University of Thrace · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to assess the performance of VibraTip, a device used to test a person's vibration perception during routine checks for peripheral neuropathy, against two thresholds of the Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS) for diagnosing distal symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSPN) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

methodsOne hundred consecutive subjects with T2DM were enrolled in the study, of whom 54 were men. The mean age was 62.3 years, and the mean T2DM duration was 12.6 years. VibraTip was used at one foot site (on the pulp of the hallux; protocol A) and at three foot sites (pulp of the hallux and first and third metatarsal head; protocol B). NDS thresholds of  ≥ 3 and ≥ 6 were used to establish the diagnosis of DSPN.

resultsAgainst the NDS ≥ 3 threshold, VibraTip showed a very high sensitivity (91.3%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (92%) and a high specificity (85.2%) with protocol A, and a very high sensitivity (95.6%) and NPV (96.1%) and a very high specificity (90.7%) with protocol B. Against the NDS ≥ 6 threshold, VibraTip showed a very high sensitivity (100%) and NPV (100%) and a very high specificity (95.2%) with protocol A, and very high sensitivity (100%) and NPV (100%) and very high specificity (96.8%) with protocol B.

conclusionsThe diagnostic performance of VibraTip is very high in patients with T2DM, rendering it a very useful device as a screening tool, particularly for the exclusion of DSPN. VibraTip performs very well at both NDS thresholds, but particularly well at the NDS ≥ 6 threshold. There appears to be no need to examine sites other than the hallux site with Vibratip.

Indexed as

Clinical examinationComplicationsDiabetic neuropathyDiagnosisType 2 diabetes mellitusVibratip

Identifiers

PMID31782049
PMCPMC6965598
OpenAlexW2991161578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.