Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31782027›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2020

Emotional overeating questionnaire: a validation study in Italian adults with obesity, overweight or normal weight.

Giulia Casu, Paola Gremigni, Robin M Masheb

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of Emotional Eater Questionnaire (EEQ) in Spanish Colleges.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giulia CasuDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat, 5, 40127, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5441-3044
Paola GremigniDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat, 5, 40127, Bologna, Italy. paola.gremigni2@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1527-2434
Robin M MashebDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, 300 George St, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6799-6012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed at testing the validity and reliability of the Emotional Overeating Questionnaire (EOQ) in a sample of Italian adults with obesity, overweight or normal weight. MATERIALS AND

methodsParticipants were 314 Italian adults (72.6% females, aged 18-76 years) with obesity (27.4%), overweight (21.3%), or normal weight (51.3%), who completed the EOQ and measures of binge eating, mental well-being, and mindful eating. Retesting was performed 4 weeks later in a randomly selected subsample of 60 participants. Factor structure of the EOQ was estimated by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was tested with McDonald's ω and ordinal α coefficients for internal consistency and Cohen's weighted Kappa coefficient (K

resultsBased on CFA, the five negative emotional items formed one factor (EOQ-5) with good reliability (ω = 0.89; ordinal α = 0.88; K

conclusionsEOQ-5 is a valid and reliable tool for measuring the frequency of emotional overeating at the Italian community-level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, cross-sectional, descriptive study.

Indexed as

HyperphagiaOverweightAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleObesityReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesConfirmatory factor analysisEmotional overeatingNormal-weightObesityOverweightSex differencesValidation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.