Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31781939›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2019

Variant Histology in Bladder Cancer-Current Understanding of Pathologic Subtypes.

Manju Aron

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Manju AronUniversity of Southern California, 1500 San Pablo Street, Room 2409, HC 4, Los Angeles, CA, 90033-5313, USA. manjuaro@med.usc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewUrothelial carcinomas (UC) are characterized by variant morphologies. However, the diagnosis of these variants can be challenging, in part due to their evolving diagnostic criteria. This review discusses the diagnostic criteria, molecular features, and prognostic implications of the UC variants. Evolving subtypes of UC are also briefly discussed. RECENT

findingsThe WHO 2016 classification of tumors of the urinary system has refined the morphologic criteria for the diagnosis of UC variants. Many of these follow a more aggressive clinical course, but conclusive data on their effect on survival are lacking. The molecular alterations characteristic of some of these variants may be amenable to targeted therapies. Accurate identification of variant histology in UC has important implications for patient management. Despite identification of distinct molecular alterations in some of these variants, current molecular classifiers of invasive UC have not been significantly analyzed in these subtypes, opening up areas of future research.

Indexed as

CarcinomaCarcinoma, Transitional CellHumansPrognosisUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBladder carcinomaDivergent differentiationUrothelial carcinoma variantsVariant histology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.