ArticleEuropean radiology2020
Multiparametric MRI and
Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative PET or PET/CT for malignant diagnosis of Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- CT of benign polypoid gastric masses: pearls, pitfalls & differential diagnosis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- A CT-based decision tree model for differentiating sub-3 cm gastric ectopic pancreas from gastrointestinal stromal tumors.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Malignant gastric glomus tumor with heterochronous liver metastases: a case report and review of the literature.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Review
- Malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor of the ileum: A case report and review of imaging characteristics.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Imaging findings of gastric glomus tumors.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Clinicopathological features and treatment of gastrointestinal schwannomas.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Ultrasound and Gastric Sub-Epithelial Lesions: Ultrasonographic Features, Tissue Acquisition Strategies, and Therapeutic Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- An ensemble machine learning model assists in the diagnosis of gastric ectopic pancreas and gastric stromal tumors.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Gastric schwannoma: Two case reports and review of the literature.Radiology case reports · 2023Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Gastrointestinal Tract: Current Role, Recent Advancements and Future Prospectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- EUS-Guided Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions, What Is New?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- The Utility of Conventional CT, CT Perfusion and Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Predicting the Risk Level of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Stomach: A Prospective Comparison of Classical CT Features, CT Perfusion Values, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Derived Parameters.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive radiological review.Japanese journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Utility of noncontrast MRI in the detection and risk grading of gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Glomus tumor of the duodenum: a rare case report.Surgical case reports · 2020Article
- Revisiting the WHO classification system of soft tissue tumours: emphasis on advanced magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Part 1.Polish journal of radiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate whether multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and
methodsThis retrospective study included 56 patients with pathologically confirmed GISTs (n = 39), leiomyoma (n = 8), schwannoma (n = 5), heterotopic pancreas (n = 3), and glomus tumor (n = 1) who underwent MRI and/or PET examinations. Two radiologists reviewed MRI regarding location, shape, contour, growth pattern, margin, signal intensity (SI) on T1- (T1WI) and T2-weighted images (T2WI), degree and pattern of enhancement, hemorrhage, and necrosis. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV
resultsSize, longitudinal location, shape, contour, growth pattern, SI on T1- and T2WI, enhancement pattern, hemorrhage, necrosis, ADC, and SUV
conclusionsSeveral qualitative and quantitative MRI and PET features including ADC and SUV KEY POINTS: • Several qualitative MRI features are helpful in distinguishing gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) from non-GISTs as well as high-risk GISTs from low-risk GISTs. • Apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted imaging can be useful in distinguishing GISTs from non-GISTs as well as high-risk GISTs from low-risk GISTs. • PET has the potential to distinguish between high-risk and low-risk GISTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.