Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31781857›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of nutrition2020

Improving type 2 diabetes mellitus glycaemic control through lifestyle modification implementing diet intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laura García-Molina, Anne-Mary Lewis-Mikhael, Blanca Riquelme-Gallego, Naomi Cano-Ibáñez, María-Jesús Oliveras-López, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Nutritional Status Measurement Instruments for Diabetes: A Systematic Psychometric Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura García-MolinaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Avenida de la Investigación, 11, 18016, Granada, Spain. lgarmol@ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8703-0434
Anne-Mary Lewis-MikhaelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7198-8325
Blanca Riquelme-GallegoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Avenida de la Investigación, 11, 18016, Granada, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3422-7310
Naomi Cano-IbáñezDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Avenida de la Investigación, 11, 18016, Granada, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3640-5486
María-Jesús Oliveras-LópezDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering, University Pablo de Olavide, Carretera de Utrera, Km 1, 41013, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4036-9211
Aurora Bueno-CavanillasDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Avenida de la Investigación, 11, 18016, Granada, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0649-3016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeType 2 diabetes mellitus represents a significant health problem. Many studies have reported that intensive nutritional intervention by itself or in addition to medications is the best method to improve glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, in clinical practice, dietary education is not implemented as an integral part in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyse the scientific evidence concerning the role of nutritional intervention in the glycaemic control of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

methodsWe searched Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases from inception till May 2019 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that include dietary interventions in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

resultsA total of 28 studies were included. Our results demonstrated that lifestyle interventions significantly lowered glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA

conclusionsThe available evidence from RCTs shows that lifestyle intervention is more effective than the standard care regarding the glycaemic control of type 2 diabetic patients, particularly when there is a weight loss. It is time to translate this evidence to the primary health care practice. The protocol of the present systematic review was registered in PROSPERO, registration number CRD42018090469.

Indexed as

Life StyleDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietGlycemic ControlHumansDietGlycaemic controlLifestyle interventionMeta-analysisSystematic reviewType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID31781857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.