Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31781835›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2020

Antimicrobial de-escalation in critically ill patients: a position statement from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Critically Ill Patients Study Group (ESGCIP).

Alexis Tabah, Matteo Bassetti, Marin H Kollef, Jean-Ralph Zahar, José-Artur Paiva, Jean-Francois Timsit, Jason A Roberts, Jeroen Schouten, Helen Giamarellou, Jordi Rello and 6 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Recommendations for antibacterial therapy in adults with COVID-19 - an evidence based guideline.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. A multi-site observational study of rationality assessment for carbapenem use in China: carbapenem stewardship opportunities.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Gram-negative bloodstream infections: where can we do better? A retrospective cohort study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Observational
  18. Optimal antibiotic use in the intensive care unit.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  19. New Insights inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Alexis TabahIntensive Care Unit, Redcliffe and Caboolture Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. a.tabah@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3513-2778
Matteo BassettiInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Medicine, University of Udine and Santa Maria Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Marin H KollefDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Jean-Ralph ZaharHygiène Hospitalière Et Prévention du Risque Infectieux, CHU Avicenne, AP-HP, 125 rue de Stalingrad, 93000, Bobigny, France.
José-Artur PaivaIntensive Care Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Faculty of Medicine and University of Porto, Grupo de Infecçao e Sépsis, Porto, Portugal.
Jean-Francois TimsitMedical and Infectious Diseases Intensive Care Unit, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France.
Jason A RobertsUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, and Centre for Translational Anti-infective Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Jeroen SchoutenDepartment of Intensive Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9118-4420
Helen Giamarellou1st Department of Internal Medicine-Infectious Diseases, Hygeia General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Jordi RelloCIBERES and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Barcelona, Spain.
Jan De WaeleDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1017-9748
Andrew F ShorrMedstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington DC, USA.
Marc LeoneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Aix Marseille Université, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3097-758X
Garyphallia Poulakou3rd Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Sotiria General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Pieter DepuydtDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Jose Garnacho-MonteroIntensive Care Clinical Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2542-7601

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial de-escalation (ADE) is a strategy of antimicrobial stewardship, aiming at preventing the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) by decreasing the exposure to broad-spectrum antimicrobials. There is no high-quality research on ADE and its effects on AMR. Its definition varies and there is little evidence-based guidance for clinicians to use ADE in the intensive care unit (ICU).

methodsA task force of 16 international experts was formed in November 2016 to provide with guidelines for clinical practice to develop questions targeted at defining ADE, its effects on the ICU population and to provide clinical guidance. Groups of 2 experts were assigned 1-2 questions each within their field of expertise to provide draft statements and rationale. A Delphi method, with 3 rounds and an agreement threshold of 70% was required to reach consensus.

resultsWe present a comprehensive document with 13 statements, reviewing the evidence on the definition of ADE, its effects in the ICU population and providing guidance for clinicians in subsets of clinical scenarios where ADE may be considered.

conclusionADE remains a topic of controversy due to the complexity of clinical scenarios where it may be applied and the absence of evidence to the effects it may have on antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipCritical CareCritical IllnessEuropeExpert TestimonyHumansIntensive Care UnitsMicrobiologySocieties, MedicalAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial de-escalationAntimicrobial resistanceDe-escalationStewardship

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.