Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31781827›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2020

Quality improvement of end‑of‑life decision-making and communication in the ICU : Effect on clinicians' burnout and relatives' distress.

Daniel Schwarzkopf, Christine Pausch, Andreas Kortgen, Albrecht Guenther, Konrad Reinhart, Christiane S Hartog

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The impact of bereavement support on psychological distress in family members: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel SchwarzkopfCenter for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Christine PauschInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Härtelstraße 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas KortgenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Albrecht GuentherDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Konrad ReinhartCenter for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Christiane S HartogCenter for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. Christiane.hartog@mailbox.org.
Jena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEnd-of-life (EOL) decision-making is stressful. We conducted a quality improvement initiative to EOL decision-making and reduce stress for clinicians and patients' relatives.

methodsA before-after study running from 2010-2014 at four interdisciplinary intensive care units (ICU) in a German university hospital was performed. Between periods, a multifaceted intervention was implemented to improve timeliness, clinician involvement, and organisational support. Consecutive patients with severe sepsis and therapy limitations were included. Relatives were interviewed by telephone after 90 days to assess their psychological symptoms. Clinician burnout was assessed by staff surveys in each period.

resultsParticipation in the pre- and postintervention period was 84/145 and 90/159 among relatives, and 174/284 and 122/297 among ICU clinicians. Staff judged intervention elements as mostly helpful, but implementation of intervention elements was heterogeneous. From pre- to postintervention, relatives' risk of posttraumatic stress, depression and anxiety did not change (all p ≥ 0.464). Clinicians' risk of burnout increased (29% vs. 41%, p = 0.05). Relatives were highly satisfied in both periods (median of 9 vs. 9.2 on a 1-10 scale each). Attendings involved residents and nurses more often (both p ≤ 0.018). Nurses more often had sufficient information to talk with relatives (41% vs. 62%, p = 0.002). Time to first EOL decision as well as barriers and facilitators of EOL decision-making did not change.

conclusionsThe intervention may have increased involvement in EOL decision-making, but was accompanied by an increased risk of clinician burnout maybe due to lack of improving communication skills and organisational support. More research is needed to understand which interventions can decrease clinician burnout.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementTerminal CareBurnout, PsychologicalCommunicationHumansIntensive Care UnitsCritical careDecision-makingPhysician-nurse relationsPosttraumatic stress disorderProfessional burnoutProfessional-family relations

Identifiers

PMID31781827
OpenAlexW2989836829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.