Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31781666›Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes research2019

Vitamin D Supplementation and Cognition in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Control Trial.

Mary A Byrn, William Adams, Sue Penckofer, Mary Ann Emanuele

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Promoting Successful Cognitive Aging: A Ten-Year Update.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mary A ByrnLoyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3533-8808
William AdamsLoyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5608-3808
Sue PenckoferLoyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3497-9280
Mary Ann EmanueleLoyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK020595 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Matthew J Brady · 2013 to 2026
$20.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimType 2 diabetes increases the risk of cognitive decline which adversely impacts self-management of the disease. Evidence also supports a relationship between low serum 25(OH)D levels and poor cognition. The purpose of this trial was to assess vitamin D supplementation on cognitive executive functioning in persons living with type 2 diabetes.

methodsThis was a double-blinded RCT where participants were randomized to receive either weekly vitamin D

resultsThirty participants were randomized to either the low-dose allocation (

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first randomized control trial to examine the effects of vitamin D supplementation on cognitive function in people with type 2 diabetes. However, no significant differences in cognitive outcomes between participants who received high-dose therapy and those who received low dose were found.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersChicagoCholecalciferolCognitionCognition DisordersDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Double-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVitamin DVitamin D Deficiency25-hydroxyvitamin DBiomarkersCholecalciferolVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID31781666
PMCPMC6875298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.